RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM president: Marriage ruling is 'Dred Scott decision of our time' » Episcopalians approve ceremonies for all legally-qualified couples » NOM's wishful (and disrespectful) thinking: SCOTUS ruling is 'illegitimate' » Focus on the Family creates itemized price list for 'saving' marriage » Fox News pays this person for his opinions » Pat Buchanan doubles down on 1983 column claiming AIDS is nature's punishment » Is NOM really going to push for a constitutional convention on marriage? » Video: Great piece from 'CBS Sunday Morning' highlights sweet success » Yes, the American marriage equality fight is over—the rest is just bluster » Goodnight from the White House to your house  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

02/24/2005

Going to the chapel and we're gonna get "civil unioned"

by Jeremy Hooper

On Wednesday, The Connecticut Legislature's Judiciary Committee voted 25-13, in favor of legislation that would create a civil unions system.

One of those voting against the measure was Sen. Mary Ann Handley, although her reasons for doing so are not what you might think. Handley actually really likes the homo-gays and wants to see them fully married, not just "civil unioned." In the wisest words we've heard regarding the issue, Handley compared civil unions to giving women the right to vote, but only for the school board.

Handley's thoughts are shared by much of Connecticut's gay community, who are happy that their lawmakers are so tolerant, but feel that civil unions could be a step backwards in the struggle for full equality. It's a debatable situation with few easy answers, as the territory is widely unchartered. But we do have ONE question:

Is there still cake at a civil union? We really like cake.

State judiciary committee approves civil unions for gay couples [AP via WFSB.com]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails