RECENT  POSTS:  » 'No Law Against Woman Marrying Another Woman', says 103 years ago » What the hell is Brian Brown smoking?! » Their bullcaca will never ENDA » Here it is: 'The Manhattan Declaration' » For Gwen For Lateisha For Angie For Adolphus For Simmie For Ebony For Lawrence For Duanna For... » Far right to issue manifesto, drag Big Apple into rotten attacks » 'Daily' video: Wise beyond years vs. unwise inability to get beyond fears » Well since you did ask, Pete... » Poll: NJ will come down to those who can't/won't make up damn mind » Houston, chronically: City's 2nd anti-gay story in as many days  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/24/2005

Robertson struggles to emerge from the deep doo-doo of his own making

  In response to his asinine assassination comments that made everyone assume he was an ass, Pat Robertson is now claiming that he was misinterpreted and that he merely implied that U.S. forces should "take [Venezuelan Pres. Chavez] out," not kill him.

Though we really shouldn't be surprised that he interprets statements like "...if he thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it" as benign, non-encouragements of homicide, since he also duplicitously defines "insanely anti-gay" as merely "pro-family."

Patty Cake blames the AP for falsely reporting on his statements, as apparently he's yet to realize that video is actually a recorded medium, and that we really don't have to rely on the Associated Press to interpret his nonsense for us. We can see it for ourselves in its full digital glory.

Next thing you know, he'll try to tell us that "The 700 Club" isn't filled with propaganda!

Robertson: Chavez remarks misinterpreted [CNN]

***UPDATE: Pat Robertson Clarifies His Statement Regarding Hugo Chavez [PatRobertson.com]

gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-AddThis Feed Button gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


*Why are my comments not appearing? See the G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails