RECENT  POSTS:  » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama » In 2008, the AFA was the same on LGBT rights as President Obama; and I was a flying unicorn » The Hitching Post plot thickens in a truly remarkable way » On Rivka, Robert and their dirty, self-victimizing, anti-intellectual blame game » POTUS believes in fifty-state equality, happy with way it's playing out » But your subjective view of 'real' marriage is factually irrelevant, Ryan » Flip Benham (yes, their dad) reportedly protesting outside NC weddings  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/08/2005

'Concerned Women's' Schwarzenegger 'concerns' border on full-blown obsession

by Jeremy Hooper

Taken from Concerned Women For America's front page, 9/08/05, 5:18PM (pink highlighting is our own):

Cwf

Ladies, we get it; you're happy that Arnie will apparently veto California's same-sex marriage bill. But four pieces dedicated to the subject? Ya know, Concerned Women for Austrian-born Americans really doesn't have the same ring to it.

Now get off the Arnold kick, anxious lassies, and ban, burn, or boycott something fruity so that we can rib you for something more substantial than your overzealous tendencies when it comes to the Kindergarten Cop. We're starting to think your 'concern' for him is greater than your 'concern' for us, and frankly, that just plain hurts.

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails