RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/08/2005

'Concerned Women's' Schwarzenegger 'concerns' border on full-blown obsession

by Jeremy Hooper

Taken from Concerned Women For America's front page, 9/08/05, 5:18PM (pink highlighting is our own):

Cwf

Ladies, we get it; you're happy that Arnie will apparently veto California's same-sex marriage bill. But four pieces dedicated to the subject? Ya know, Concerned Women for Austrian-born Americans really doesn't have the same ring to it.

Now get off the Arnold kick, anxious lassies, and ban, burn, or boycott something fruity so that we can rib you for something more substantial than your overzealous tendencies when it comes to the Kindergarten Cop. We're starting to think your 'concern' for him is greater than your 'concern' for us, and frankly, that just plain hurts.

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails