RECENT  POSTS:  » Whether justified or Kim Davis-ed, individualistic rage rarely outplays broader truths » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/08/2005

'Concerned Women's' Schwarzenegger 'concerns' border on full-blown obsession

by Jeremy Hooper

Taken from Concerned Women For America's front page, 9/08/05, 5:18PM (pink highlighting is our own):

Cwf

Ladies, we get it; you're happy that Arnie will apparently veto California's same-sex marriage bill. But four pieces dedicated to the subject? Ya know, Concerned Women for Austrian-born Americans really doesn't have the same ring to it.

Now get off the Arnold kick, anxious lassies, and ban, burn, or boycott something fruity so that we can rib you for something more substantial than your overzealous tendencies when it comes to the Kindergarten Cop. We're starting to think your 'concern' for him is greater than your 'concern' for us, and frankly, that just plain hurts.

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails