RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM versus David Koch » Anti-equality baseball player calls reporter 'a prick' for asking about his anti-equality advocacy » Audio: Josh Duggar defends discrimination, invalidates own point » Audio: AFA's Fischer names 'homosexual agenda' as 'greatest threat to liberty' in American history » Audio: AFA Radio caller calls for executing gays; FRC-employed host doesn't even challenge him, much less condemn » NOM president's other organization is 'in trouble' (his words) too » FRC prays to take LGBT Americans out of nondiscrimination law » In lieu of typing 'Look how desperate we are' over and over again, NOM president wrote this instead » I'll remind you that FRC also compared our marriages to human-horse unions » GLAAD: Scott Lively claims homosexuality worse than mass murder 'from God's perspective'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/29/2005

Does 'nearly married' mean 'fully insured?'

by Jeremy Hooper

  According to an AP report, there is some confusion among Connecticut businesses as to what benefits they'll be required to offer "civil-unioned" same-sex couples, once such "almost-marriages" become legal in the state this Saturday.

According to us, the bosses best not be confused about our right to the joyous bounty of waffle irons and China pieces afforded to our newly wedded hetero co-workers, or they'll have some extremely pissed-off "cases of the Mondays" on their hands, the likes of which they've never seen. Equality begins with top of the line, shiny, silver appliances.

Bosses have to shift for civil unions [AP via ConnPost.com]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails