RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: Voices from our pro-equality future (present?) » Anti-gay orgs continue to offend children of single parents, gay parents, more » Apple CEO gives 'substantial' sum to HRC's southern state project; may or may not have used ApplePay » Conservative proposes new way for vendors to tell gay customers they don't care for them » NOM versus David Koch » Anti-equality baseball player calls reporter 'a prick' for asking about his anti-equality advocacy » Audio: Josh Duggar defends discrimination, invalidates own point » Audio: AFA's Fischer names 'homosexual agenda' as 'greatest threat to liberty' in American history » Audio: AFA Radio caller calls for executing gays; FRC-employed host doesn't even challenge him, much less condemn » NOM president's other organization is 'in trouble' (his words) too  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/26/2005

Goin' to Connecticut and we're gonna get civil unioned

by Jeremy Hooper

    This Saturday (Oct. 1), Connecticut will become the second U.S. state to almost kinda-sorta let gays get close to hitched nearly, when they begin offering civil unions to same-sex duos. Keeping with the official tone of the quasi-nuptials, CT gay couples will follow their unions with honeymoon-like vacations known as "Life companion excursions with a romantic intent."

At a conference this weekend to discuss the "more or less marriages," it was reportedly suggested that justices of the peace use the terms "man" and "woman" instead of "husband" and "wife" when referring to the couples, and that the word "wed" should be replaced with the term "joined." Though annoying that any sort of jargon alterations are necessary, we'll consider civilly joining in on the "close to wedded" fun as long as the "gifts" stay "plentiful" and the "bar" remains "open."

State braces for civil unions [Danbury News-Times]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails