RECENT  POSTS:  » Report: US District judge won't deny justice to gay Coloradans; might delay it, though » AFA to POTUS: End your 'love affair with homosexuality,' give anti-gay Christians entitlement instead » Congressional right wing's right-side-of-history whip count: 8–271 » NOM, Manhattan Declaration turn Unitarian's anti-slavery, anti-war into pro-discrimination anthem » Matt Barber and Peter LaBarbera tease America's coming anti-gay street revolts » FRC writer: We're not all the same, 'gay agenda' is 'dangerous for the wellbeing of this nation' » NBC analyst Tony Dungy says he wouldn't have drafted Michael Sam » NOM becomes even more of a generalized anti-LGBT animus organization » Sure, NOM—I'll play your game!! » Bryan Fischer: POTUS 'stood on the graves' of Malaysia Air victims 'to promote the legitimacy of sexual deviancy'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/16/2005

Senator cites CWA as 'key members'; we suggest alternative descriptors

by Jeremy Hooper

    According to the Concerned Women For America, during last week's Senate subcommittee hearing addressing a proposed federal amendment to ban gay marriage, U.S. Senator Russ Feingold (D-Wisconsin) mentioned CWA and their head "Concerned Woman," Robert Knight (pic.), as "key members of the debate for traditional marriage."

To which we say: Good for you Mr. Feingold; though personally we would have called them "leading peckers," as not everyone knows that "members" is a euphemism for "dicks." After all, you don't want to be misinterpreted.

Marriage Amendment Passes Subcommittee, Moves to Judiciary Committee [CWA]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails