RECENT  POSTS:  » No, you really don't seem to know what tyranny is, Jerry Cox » Vatican's #Humanum event meant to paint gay families as 'evil' and 'obscene,' admits invited guest » Read: Federal judge calls MS's marriage ban what it is: discriminatory » Yet another federal judge accurately notes crude discrimination within Arkansas' marriage ban » Prominent conservative outlet equates LGBT activists with Nazi paramilitary » New pledge: Conservative pastors choose to separate selves from civil marriage » Read: ADF creates fake 'victim' superbook; misapplies business matters to churches » P&G reaches out to pro-discrimination activist, learns it made right choice » In prep for Pope's 2015 visit, World Meeting of Families readies gay stigma, exclusion » Today in ambition: NOM cofounder vows to fight marriage equality for 100 years  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/16/2005

Senator cites CWA as 'key members'; we suggest alternative descriptors

by Jeremy Hooper

    According to the Concerned Women For America, during last week's Senate subcommittee hearing addressing a proposed federal amendment to ban gay marriage, U.S. Senator Russ Feingold (D-Wisconsin) mentioned CWA and their head "Concerned Woman," Robert Knight (pic.), as "key members of the debate for traditional marriage."

To which we say: Good for you Mr. Feingold; though personally we would have called them "leading peckers," as not everyone knows that "members" is a euphemism for "dicks." After all, you don't want to be misinterpreted.

Marriage Amendment Passes Subcommittee, Moves to Judiciary Committee [CWA]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails