RECENT  POSTS:  » GLAAD: Why would we silence unwittingly helpful voices like yours, Peter LaBarbera? » Photo: NOM fully (and finally) owning its wholly faith-driven root » Our winning movement wins another one: Judge says Ohio must recognize out-of-state marriages » Video: Tony Perkins is pissssssssssssed at Chick-fil-a » You must be so proud of this headline, @ChristianPost » READ: Full page 'NY Times' ad pleas to supposedly refreshing new Pope: Take strong stand for LGBT youth » Harriet Tubman, Sojourner Truth, and—activists who try to strip certain citizens of certain civil rights?! » Here we go again: Anti-equality activist going after Christian publisher for simply publishing an LGBT-affirming view » Photo: Equal marriage in Utah is like—stepping on a sailor's face?! » NOM co-founder warns Christians of the supposed gay-initiated perils that lie ahead  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/16/2005

Senator cites CWA as 'key members'; we suggest alternative descriptors

by Jeremy Hooper

    According to the Concerned Women For America, during last week's Senate subcommittee hearing addressing a proposed federal amendment to ban gay marriage, U.S. Senator Russ Feingold (D-Wisconsin) mentioned CWA and their head "Concerned Woman," Robert Knight (pic.), as "key members of the debate for traditional marriage."

To which we say: Good for you Mr. Feingold; though personally we would have called them "leading peckers," as not everyone knows that "members" is a euphemism for "dicks." After all, you don't want to be misinterpreted.

Marriage Amendment Passes Subcommittee, Moves to Judiciary Committee [CWA]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails