RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/16/2005

Senator cites CWA as 'key members'; we suggest alternative descriptors

by Jeremy Hooper

    According to the Concerned Women For America, during last week's Senate subcommittee hearing addressing a proposed federal amendment to ban gay marriage, U.S. Senator Russ Feingold (D-Wisconsin) mentioned CWA and their head "Concerned Woman," Robert Knight (pic.), as "key members of the debate for traditional marriage."

To which we say: Good for you Mr. Feingold; though personally we would have called them "leading peckers," as not everyone knows that "members" is a euphemism for "dicks." After all, you don't want to be misinterpreted.

Marriage Amendment Passes Subcommittee, Moves to Judiciary Committee [CWA]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails