RECENT  POSTS:  » And now in news for the naive: As long as gay scouts are banned, boys won't discuss sex » Supposedly marriage-focused NOM promotes Boy Scouts discrimination » Married gay celeb challenges misconceptions, elementary-level spelling errors » Anita, meet Uma » WaPo poll: Majority of Virginians are for *all* lovers » GLAAD: Equal Scouting opponent says BSA only bans activists; is fibbing » Drug-resistant gonorrhea is a 'wage of sin'? NOM senior staffer 'likes' that » What the Boy Scouts' anti-equality coalition is engendering » Video: French waitress comes out, celebrates marriage equality; your grilled cheese will have to wait » The weirdest anti-gay video you will ever see; I'm serious; guaranteed; just watch  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

12/22/2005

No pre-nup signed, David Furnish's fortune now vulnerable in unlikely event of divorce

by Jeremy Hooper

   It has been reported that Sir Elton John did not have David Furnish sign a pre-nup before the duo got hitched yesterday, with the wealthy pop giant being quoted as saying:

If I had asked David to sign a pre-nup I would have destroyed part of that faith we have in one another. I just feel that a little something between us would have been lost.”

Our translation: David is a f***ing TIGER in the sack, and while I may hold the riches, as long as he continues to do that special thing that he does, the power is all his.

Don't go breaking his heart [The Sun]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails