RECENT  POSTS:  » GOP pollster Luntz to Heritage Foundation's Anderson: 'Gay marriage is harmless' » Read: Federal court judge rules against Colorado's discriminatory marriage ban » You guys, will you please pipe down so Sen. Rubio can dismantle your deserved freedoms? » 'Mask is coming off' LGBTs, says man who vowed to export and/or criminalize LGBTs » Exxon, infamous holdout on fair and decent employment protections, could be running out of options » Oregon baker who refused same-sex wedding cake bakes for 'ex-gay' org » PFOX rebrands; into group play, seemingly » Audio: Listen to this ADF spinmeister and his anti-gay spin » Report: US District judge won't deny justice to gay Coloradans; might delay it, though » AFA to POTUS: End your 'love affair with homosexuality,' give anti-gay Christians entitlement instead  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

12/05/2005

Wisconsin Senate to consider marriage-banning measure; we've already considered it and, quite frankly, it reminded us of week-old pig vomit

by Jeremy Hooper

   The Wisconsin Senate will vote on a proposed gay marriage amendment tomorrow, where, just as it did last year, it is expected to pass. If it does, in fact, receive the go-ahead in the Senate and then gets another majority of 'ayes' in the House, the bullsh*t would then be put before the state's voters this November. And we all know how well those referenda tend to go.

Some are encouraging their Senators that an 'aye' would be a vote for discrimination, while other, more misguided folks are telling the lawmakers to support the measure in order to "protect marriage." We, however, would like to take a more rational approach and simply say to the legislators: If you vote in favor of this, God will cancel Christmas.

Senate Committee Approves Gay Marriage Amendment [AP via WFRV.com]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails