RECENT  POSTS:  » No, you really don't seem to know what tyranny is, Jerry Cox » Vatican's #Humanum event meant to paint gay families as 'evil' and 'obscene,' admits invited guest » Read: Federal judge calls MS's marriage ban what it is: discriminatory » Yet another federal judge accurately notes crude discrimination within Arkansas' marriage ban » Prominent conservative outlet equates LGBT activists with Nazi paramilitary » New pledge: Conservative pastors choose to separate selves from civil marriage » Read: ADF creates fake 'victim' superbook; misapplies business matters to churches » P&G reaches out to pro-discrimination activist, learns it made right choice » In prep for Pope's 2015 visit, World Meeting of Families readies gay stigma, exclusion » Today in ambition: NOM cofounder vows to fight marriage equality for 100 years  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

12/05/2005

Wisconsin Senate to consider marriage-banning measure; we've already considered it and, quite frankly, it reminded us of week-old pig vomit

by Jeremy Hooper

   The Wisconsin Senate will vote on a proposed gay marriage amendment tomorrow, where, just as it did last year, it is expected to pass. If it does, in fact, receive the go-ahead in the Senate and then gets another majority of 'ayes' in the House, the bullsh*t would then be put before the state's voters this November. And we all know how well those referenda tend to go.

Some are encouraging their Senators that an 'aye' would be a vote for discrimination, while other, more misguided folks are telling the lawmakers to support the measure in order to "protect marriage." We, however, would like to take a more rational approach and simply say to the legislators: If you vote in favor of this, God will cancel Christmas.

Senate Committee Approves Gay Marriage Amendment [AP via WFRV.com]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails