RECENT  POSTS:  » Whether justified or Kim Davis-ed, individualistic rage rarely outplays broader truths » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

12/05/2005

Wisconsin Senate to consider marriage-banning measure; we've already considered it and, quite frankly, it reminded us of week-old pig vomit

by Jeremy Hooper

   The Wisconsin Senate will vote on a proposed gay marriage amendment tomorrow, where, just as it did last year, it is expected to pass. If it does, in fact, receive the go-ahead in the Senate and then gets another majority of 'ayes' in the House, the bullsh*t would then be put before the state's voters this November. And we all know how well those referenda tend to go.

Some are encouraging their Senators that an 'aye' would be a vote for discrimination, while other, more misguided folks are telling the lawmakers to support the measure in order to "protect marriage." We, however, would like to take a more rational approach and simply say to the legislators: If you vote in favor of this, God will cancel Christmas.

Senate Committee Approves Gay Marriage Amendment [AP via WFRV.com]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails