RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/01/2006

ADF still protecting the sanctity of bias

by Jeremy Hooper

Responding to a federal judge's ruling that students in Boyd County, Kentucky, do not have the right to opt of court-mandated diversity training, the Alliance Defense Fund's Kevin Theriot (who argued on behalf of the anti-diveristy training side) cites the silver lining of the ruling as being that:

"They had a policy before we filed the lawsuit that said that a student couldn't tell another student that homosexual behavior is wrong," he explains. "After we filed the lawsuit, they changed the policy."

Well, THANK GOD for that! Rumor has it that Theriot will next take up a case in which he'll measure victory by the number of kids who are driven towards crippling depression as result of their fellow pupils' taunts and insults.

Families Sue to Opt Their Kids Out of School-Mandated Pro-Homosexual Seminar [Agape]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails