RECENT  POSTS:  » AG Holder: 'Marriage equality is an idea whose time has come.' » Viciously anti-gay activist Scott Lively to help us show SCOTUS what animus looks like; thanks, doll! » Audio: NOM prez equates his anti-gay fight with defeating slavery, conquering 'evils that were occurring in the Roman empire' » SCOTUS deals another blow to NOM; more to surely come! » Federal judge strikes Nebraska's discriminatory marriage ban » CA Republicans of 2015 do thing that will make CA Republicans of 2025 say, 'Yeah. Okay. so?' » NC activists choose name that sounds like Lifetime movie, plot that's discriminatory » Video: Man who's directly compared homosexuality to pedophilia will now lecture you on extremism » The 'why can't they take their business elsewhere?' line: Not only offensive but legally meaningless » FRC's ridiculously bunk new poll (*from partisan polling firm)  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/30/2006

Every time a Scalia speaks, we imagine sirens and officers in our bedrooms

by Jeremy Hooper

  Via CNN, the following gay-related comments from Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia (pic.) have recently surfaced:

"Question comes up: Is there a constitutional right to homosexual conduct? Not a hard question for me. It's absolutely clear that nobody ever thought when the Bill of Rights was adopted that it gave a right to homosexual conduct. Homosexual conduct was criminal for 200 years in every state. Easy question."

So to get a response to Scalia, we decided to hold a seance and conjure up the spirits of the slaves held by any of those responsible for the Bill of Rights. But unfortunately the slaves had little insight to offer, as they all agreed they had little interaction with their masters unless they were being beaten.

As that ghost-conjuring was unsuccessful, we decided to tap into the soul of some of the wives of the founding fathers; however, none of them had much helpful information, as they mostly just replied "But I'm a woman -- what do I know about issues? I mean, it's not like I can vote or have any real say in man's work, can I?"

Deciding to cut out the middle men and just go for those who actually put quill to parchment, we focused really hard and called on the souls of Washington, Jefferson, et al. Basically they just told us that yea, they did some things and held some ideas that those of us in this century would certainly look down upon, but that they simply didn't know better. Their bottom line was that societies change and adapt, and as we all collectively learn more about right/wrong, we realize that our rules and laws must also keep up with the changing times.

Don't justify a position by citing a long-held wrong, Mr. Scalia. History is filled such fallaciousness.

Scalia again draws criticism for antigay comments [AP via Advocate]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails