RECENT  POSTS:  » Audio: Putting discrimination of the defensive » When it comes to bias, NOM hopes its caca will be good Garden State fertilizer » Video: You don't 'understand' us? Well here, let us translate: ☮, ♥, = » WND poll: Belying an entire movement's 'we're not anti-gay' rhetoric » Papal papers: Official Catholics vs. unacknowledged Catholic front group » Was that praying or preying, Wendster? » NOM: The worst New Jersey joke ever CONcocted » Culture Warrin' (G. Harding) » Audio: Thank you for your call, now let us denigrate your faith and 'lifestyle' » Gays, Gap, and 'Whateveryouwannakah': All euphemisms for evil, say anti-gay Mainers  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/09/2006

Ruling: Berkeley (the city, not Elizabeth) free to deny 'free' to aquatic Scouts

The California Supreme Court has ruled that the city of Berkeley has every right to deny free usage of the local marina to the area Sea Scouts, on the basis of the anti-gay, anti-Atheist positions of their affiliated organization, the Boy Scouts of America. But why were they ever granted free usage in the first place, you ask? Well, under a 1997 policy, the city provides free berthing to nonprofits that don't discriminate. However, the city demanded the Sea Scouts cough up some cash for their marina usage, because they were deemed to be in violation of the measure.

Got all that? There will be a test.

It's unclear whether the "C Scouts" -- a group of young outdoorsmen who can't quite manage a "B," but whose grade point average has yet to fall to "D" -- will also be affected by the ruling; however, since we made them up as a way to get out of this ultra-boring post, we highly doubt it.

Justices OK Berkeley's move against Boy Scouts group [AP via MercuryNews.com]

gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-AddThis Feed Button gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


*Why are my comments not appearing? See the G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails