RECENT  POSTS:  » Man who insinuated it's better to be thrown into sea than support homosexuality attended #SB101 signing ceremony » Considering vast (and frankly odd) amount of time he spends talking about us, no wonder Tony Perkins thinks we're 'special' » FRC keeps lying about where majority of Americans stand on marriage equality » Audio: Indiana restaurant owner openly discriminates against gays, glad to have added protection to do so » Indiana legislature, Gov. Pence awaken a fierce, powerful, anti-discrimination giant » Eleven Republican US Sens. give anti-gay conservatives a taste of a near and less divisive future » NOM proudly touts #March4Marriage backers who believe homosexuality 'should be treated by society as immoral, dangerous perversion' » Video: Gee, with compelling videos like this one, I just can't imagine why the anti-gay right is losing in court » #TBT: Even after legal equality, Americans—and particularly religious Americans—struggle to accept certain marriages » Indiana threatens its commerce, tourism dollars, reputation, general welfare of its citizenry  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

04/20/2006

It's not easy being 'King & King'

by Jeremy Hooper

   For the second time in as many years, a children's book has brought controversy to Lexington, Massachusetts' Estabrook Elementary School. And just like last year, when parent David Parker objected to a homo-themed book (We Are Family) being read to his kindergarten-aged son, this year's brouhaha involves a set of parents, Robb and Robin Worthlin, expressing outrage over their son (this time a second grader) being subjected to the "homosexual themes" of King and King. The book is a tale of a prince who's not attracted to a princess, but rather to another prince.

Of course when people cite "homosexual themes" in their opposition, that usually (even if they don't realize it) means an overall objection to "homosexuals, them." That notion is seemingly supported by Ms. Wirthlin's comments, as quoted by the AP:

'My son is only 7 years old"...''By presenting this kind of issue at such a young age, they're trying to indoctrinate our children. They're intentionally presenting this as a norm, and it's not a value that our family supports."

Riiiiiight. So should the young Wirthlin be gay, at least he'll know he must wait until he's financially stable before revealing his homosexuality "value." That's something! Most of us only have vague ideas of whether or not we'll be shunned from future Thanksgivings. For her friends and loved ones, Ms. Wirthlin has provided concrete, nationally published proof of her contempt. Could come in handy some day.

[::Writer rolls eyes so dramatically, he's sure Ms. Wirthlin will accuse him of trying to indoctrinate her children via his sarcastic eye gestures::]

No word on what Ms. Wirthlin thinks homosexuality is, if not a "norm." We're guessing...

Picture 10-12

...a "cliff."

Parents rip school over gay storybook [Boston Globe]
Gay Book Flap Erupts Again At Mass. School [KTVU.com]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails