RECENT  POSTS:  » Culture Warrin' (G. Harding) » Audio: Thank you for your call, now let us denigrate your faith and 'lifestyle' » Gays, Gap, and 'Whateveryouwannakah': All euphemisms for evil, say anti-gay Mainers » Just head as far right as possible, and you too shall find it » Anti-gay punditry: Where gays' respectful words go to die, get reincarnated as hogwash » Well we would hate to be a headache, now wouldn't we? » Oh would you look at that? Hate crimes rose right alongside far-right's lies » D.C. Catholic BULLetins ratchet up first syllable » Happy Chanukah from Focus on the Family » Adam's bits cut for too closely showing dancer if his own bits are  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/15/2006

Supremes won't hear gay parenting case; but will they smell it?

The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to hear a case in which a Washington state lesbian is seeking "de facto parenting" rights to the daughter that she and her former partner (the child's biological mother) raised together for the first seven years of the kid's life. The Supremes didn't comment on their reasons for not hearing the case; we, however, suspect the last season of the "L Word" simply left them too vulnerable to hear any more lesbian drama at this time. We all know how into the whole Lara/Alice plotline Justice Scalia was!

To the chagrin of the biological mother (Page Britain), Washington state's Supreme Court ruled in favor of the "de facto" parent (Sue Ellen Carvin) last November. Carvin must now prove that she fits the "de facto" role as it was defined by the state. However, we think she might be a little confused:

Defacto

Supreme Court won't consider gay parents rights [AP via KGW.com]

gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-AddThis Feed Button gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


*Why are my comments not appearing? See the G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails