RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/02/2006

Concerned Woman says we're da bomb

by Jeremy Hooper

Of the necessity for Congress to pass a so-called Marriage Protection Amendment, the Concerned Women for America's Jan LaRue says:

"Congress needs to awaken to the ticking sound of a time bomb that will detonate the institution of marriage. We need a federal amendment to preserve it rather than an untimely one that goes into effect in the midst of rubble."

Responding to Jan LaRue, we say:

"Hmm...actually Ms. LaRue, we think the legal recognition of our unions is less like an incendiary container designed to explode when detonated by a time mechanism, and more like the Jack Bauer who will heroically diffuse the inflammatory inequality for which organizations like yours aggressively push. We understand that framing this debate as if our side is the one on the offensive is the message from which your team will never stray, but those of us who want to marry our partners and still continue to attend the weddings of our heterosexual friends know that legalizing our unions would not destroy the institution of anything. If you guys would just cut out this offensive line of thought and say the truth -- which is that your don't care for gay people and you don't want them to achieve social parity -- then the waters of this debate would be far less muddied.

So do us all a favor, Ms. LaRue -- drop the fear-mongering playbook that tells you that painting us as if we are "time bombs" is a clever strategy. We see right through it, and others are starting to catch on as well. You don't like us getting married --
we get it. But own your antipathy, rather than scurrying to convince folks that we are the hostile ones."

Making Marriage a Constitutional Matter [CWFA]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails