RECENT  POSTS:  » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama » In 2008, the AFA was the same on LGBT rights as President Obama; and I was a flying unicorn » The Hitching Post plot thickens in a truly remarkable way  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/07/2006

CT Supremes say no to 'family' group; Diana Ross' Supremes say 'think it oh-oh-ver'

by Jeremy Hooper

  The Connecticut state Supreme Court has denied a request from the anti-gay Family Institute of Connecticut to intervene in a lawsuit seeking to legalize same-sex marriage in the state. Which is, of course, good news for those who like it when the pursuit of justice goes unmarred by the presence of duplicity; bad news for fans of false facts and junk science!

FIC reportedly wanted to enter the case so that they could "present evidence that is says shows children are hurt by living in gay and lesbian homes." And see, even in intent they're being untruthful, as everyone knows that homes don't have sex (gay or straight). They don't even have genitalia, for crying out loud! Gosh, FIC -- even an unharmed child of gay parents knows that!

State Supreme Court rejects bid to enter gay marriage fight [AP via Boston Globe]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails