RECENT  POSTS:  » No, you really don't seem to know what tyranny is, Jerry Cox » Vatican's #Humanum event meant to paint gay families as 'evil' and 'obscene,' admits invited guest » Read: Federal judge calls MS's marriage ban what it is: discriminatory » Yet another federal judge accurately notes crude discrimination within Arkansas' marriage ban » Prominent conservative outlet equates LGBT activists with Nazi paramilitary » New pledge: Conservative pastors choose to separate selves from civil marriage » Read: ADF creates fake 'victim' superbook; misapplies business matters to churches » P&G reaches out to pro-discrimination activist, learns it made right choice » In prep for Pope's 2015 visit, World Meeting of Families readies gay stigma, exclusion » Today in ambition: NOM cofounder vows to fight marriage equality for 100 years  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/07/2006

CT Supremes say no to 'family' group; Diana Ross' Supremes say 'think it oh-oh-ver'

by Jeremy Hooper

  The Connecticut state Supreme Court has denied a request from the anti-gay Family Institute of Connecticut to intervene in a lawsuit seeking to legalize same-sex marriage in the state. Which is, of course, good news for those who like it when the pursuit of justice goes unmarred by the presence of duplicity; bad news for fans of false facts and junk science!

FIC reportedly wanted to enter the case so that they could "present evidence that is says shows children are hurt by living in gay and lesbian homes." And see, even in intent they're being untruthful, as everyone knows that homes don't have sex (gay or straight). They don't even have genitalia, for crying out loud! Gosh, FIC -- even an unharmed child of gay parents knows that!

State Supreme Court rejects bid to enter gay marriage fight [AP via Boston Globe]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails