RECENT  POSTS:  » Miami-Dade Circuit judge rules state marriage ban unconstitutional; stays ruling » Video: With marriage equality, Texas could put in a pool at the Alamo » CWA ably demonstrates ludicrousness of American Christian right's persecution complex » Video: CBS News hosts '50 Years Later, Civil Rights;' includes marriage equality, obviously » Audio: White House? Nah. But in race for most anti-gay House member, Bachmann a strong contender » Brian Brown is the victim, y'all. How many times does he have to tell you? » Congrats, gay activists—Bryan Fischer has found new group for his weekly 'Nazi' branding » Maggie Gallagher: Sexual orientation is 'more akin to religion' than to race » NOM is totally popular (*in Ethiopia) » What constitutes 'absolute pure evil' in the eyes of Liberty University dean?  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/07/2006

CT Supremes say no to 'family' group; Diana Ross' Supremes say 'think it oh-oh-ver'

by Jeremy Hooper

  The Connecticut state Supreme Court has denied a request from the anti-gay Family Institute of Connecticut to intervene in a lawsuit seeking to legalize same-sex marriage in the state. Which is, of course, good news for those who like it when the pursuit of justice goes unmarred by the presence of duplicity; bad news for fans of false facts and junk science!

FIC reportedly wanted to enter the case so that they could "present evidence that is says shows children are hurt by living in gay and lesbian homes." And see, even in intent they're being untruthful, as everyone knows that homes don't have sex (gay or straight). They don't even have genitalia, for crying out loud! Gosh, FIC -- even an unharmed child of gay parents knows that!

State Supreme Court rejects bid to enter gay marriage fight [AP via Boston Globe]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails