RECENT  POSTS:  » Whether justified or Kim Davis-ed, individualistic rage rarely outplays broader truths » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/25/2006

As if we didn't have enough claims to challenge...

by Jeremy Hooper

A Google search that brought a reader to our site:

Picture 9-14

But then again, if the anti-gays can claim "sanctity of marriage protection" and "child welfare" as reasons to oppose gay marriage, we guess any and everything are fair game. Though if we start seeing signs saying "Marriage should be between one man and one woman, neither of whom appreciate irreverent approaches to activism," then we're gonna bitch.

"Why same sex marriage in usa is not a good thing" [Google Search]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails