RECENT  POSTS:  » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well?  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/25/2006

As if we didn't have enough claims to challenge...

by Jeremy Hooper

A Google search that brought a reader to our site:

Picture 9-14

But then again, if the anti-gays can claim "sanctity of marriage protection" and "child welfare" as reasons to oppose gay marriage, we guess any and everything are fair game. Though if we start seeing signs saying "Marriage should be between one man and one woman, neither of whom appreciate irreverent approaches to activism," then we're gonna bitch.

"Why same sex marriage in usa is not a good thing" [Google Search]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails