RECENT  POSTS:  » Read: NOM's guide to pressuring lawmakers to ban marriages (while pretending you're doing something good and positive instead) » Full trailer: 'The Normal Heart' » Vintage Clinton era oppo memo perhaps even more relevant today » Concerned Women For America advises churches to lockdown exclusionary marriage views » Video: What does conservative columnist Cal Thomas see as America's biggest threat? Take a guess. » Correcting NOM's fallacious fear graphic » Gee, Bryan, can't understand why federal courts are rejecting you gay = incest view » Former NOM sr. associate admits shift: Moving away from intellectual arguments, focusing on spiritual » Prop 8 defense attorney now planning lesbian daughter's wedding » If you can't afford your event, NOM, perhaps you should just cancel  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/25/2006

As if we didn't have enough claims to challenge...

by Jeremy Hooper

A Google search that brought a reader to our site:

Picture 9-14

But then again, if the anti-gays can claim "sanctity of marriage protection" and "child welfare" as reasons to oppose gay marriage, we guess any and everything are fair game. Though if we start seeing signs saying "Marriage should be between one man and one woman, neither of whom appreciate irreverent approaches to activism," then we're gonna bitch.

"Why same sex marriage in usa is not a good thing" [Google Search]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails