RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/25/2006

As if we didn't have enough claims to challenge...

by Jeremy Hooper

A Google search that brought a reader to our site:

Picture 9-14

But then again, if the anti-gays can claim "sanctity of marriage protection" and "child welfare" as reasons to oppose gay marriage, we guess any and everything are fair game. Though if we start seeing signs saying "Marriage should be between one man and one woman, neither of whom appreciate irreverent approaches to activism," then we're gonna bitch.

"Why same sex marriage in usa is not a good thing" [Google Search]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails