RECENT  POSTS:  » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something.  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/15/2006

Virginia AG proffers opinion; in our opinion, it's faulty

by Jeremy Hooper

 Virginia's Attorney General, Bob McDonnell (pic.), has issued a legal opinion saying that the state's proposed constitutional amendment banning gay marriage would not affect key domestic partner benefits.

Unless, of course, that "benefit" is "knowing that your fellow citizens respect your sexual orientation and relationship and would never in a million years vote to squash your equal rights access." That benefit? Gonna be obliterated.

McDonnell's opinion runs contrary to that of Gov. TIm Kaine, who is encouraging folks to vote against the discriminatory measure. It also runs contrary to this writer, who is encouraging ban supporters to for just one second check their convictions, allow the possibility that they may be wrong, and put themselves in the shoes of the gay residents to imagine what the threat of tyranny encroaching upon your relationship actually feels like.

McDonnell issues legal opinion on amendment to ban same-sex marriage [Virginian Pilot]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails