RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: Man who's directly compared homosexuality to pedophilia will now lecture you on extremism » The 'why can't they take their business elsewhere?' line: Not only offensive but legally meaningless » FRC's ridiculously bunk new poll (*from partisan polling firm) » Video: 'Vice' covers the sad, dangerous, discredited world of 'conversion therapy' » Buzzfeed: Jeb Bush's nascent team is teeming with gay Republicans » FRC prays against gay acceptance to 'avoid the wrath of God' » Video: Mark Cuban supports religious biz owners that 'just say no' to serving same-sex weddings » We're not driven by animus, say groups that are known for showing animus toward gay couples » Video: Onetime LGBT community foe delivers crushing blow to 'religious freedom' (a.k.a. license to discriminate) bills » Q. How does Mark Regnerus 'prove' he's not an anti-gay activist?  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/06/2006

'Worldnet' headlines: The gift that keeps on painting us a predatory

by Jeremy Hooper

To headline a piece regarding a friend-of-the-court brief filed by gay rights organizations seeking allowance of gay-inclusive materials to be used in schools without parental consent (challenging assertions that parental notification should be required before LGBT tolerance can be taught), our ol' poker buddies at WorldNetDaily use the words:

Picture 1-26

Though clearly they made a few typos, as everyone knows they meant to say:

Wndreply

You simply have to start copyediting, WorldNet! After all, there's no way you guys actually think that by encouraging our lives and families to be taught as part of the spectrum of normalcy, we are somehow targeting anyone or anything other than bias. Right?

'Gay' groups: We have rights to your children! [WND]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails