RECENT  POSTS:  » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama » In 2008, the AFA was the same on LGBT rights as President Obama; and I was a flying unicorn » The Hitching Post plot thickens in a truly remarkable way » On Rivka, Robert and their dirty, self-victimizing, anti-intellectual blame game » POTUS believes in fifty-state equality, happy with way it's playing out  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/06/2006

'Worldnet' headlines: The gift that keeps on painting us a predatory

by Jeremy Hooper

To headline a piece regarding a friend-of-the-court brief filed by gay rights organizations seeking allowance of gay-inclusive materials to be used in schools without parental consent (challenging assertions that parental notification should be required before LGBT tolerance can be taught), our ol' poker buddies at WorldNetDaily use the words:

Picture 1-26

Though clearly they made a few typos, as everyone knows they meant to say:

Wndreply

You simply have to start copyediting, WorldNet! After all, there's no way you guys actually think that by encouraging our lives and families to be taught as part of the spectrum of normalcy, we are somehow targeting anyone or anything other than bias. Right?

'Gay' groups: We have rights to your children! [WND]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails