RECENT  POSTS:  » AP report: FDA to recommend end on gay blood ban! (*UPDATED with big restriction) » Video: Another ad reflects changing (already changed?) 'Tide' » Anti-gay NOM compares its discriminatory cause to baby Jesus's early infant care » SCOTUS to begin new year by pondering outdated inequality » Video: TLC to air show about humans' ability to suppress truth in name of religion » AFA, LaBarbera think being publicly pro-gay is still a liability; how quaint » Video: Blended family with lesbian moms heads Tylenol holiday ad » NOM's new conspiracy theory: Census Bureau making changes to hide marriage equality's ill effects » Video: Voices from our pro-equality future (present?) » Anti-gay orgs continue to offend children of single parents, gay parents, more  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/30/2006

Unsurprising yet still annoying development: All seven justices to decide on Mass. marriage vote

by Jeremy Hooper

 Courts Courtsandjudges Courts Supremejudicialcourt JcowinJudith Cowin (pic.), the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Justice who earlier today heard arguments on whether or not the high court should force a state vote on gay marriage, has decided that the full seven-member panel should join her in deciding on the matter.

The full court hearing will be held on December 20 -- just five shopping around discriminatory bullsh*t days before Christmas!

Entire SJC To Hear Arguments On Gay Marriage Vote [AP via CBS 4]

Technorati Tags: , ,

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails