RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM president: Marriage ruling is 'Dred Scott decision of our time' » Episcopalians approve ceremonies for all legally-qualified couples » NOM's wishful (and disrespectful) thinking: SCOTUS ruling is 'illegitimate' » Focus on the Family creates itemized price list for 'saving' marriage » Fox News pays this person for his opinions » Pat Buchanan doubles down on 1983 column claiming AIDS is nature's punishment » Is NOM really going to push for a constitutional convention on marriage? » Video: Great piece from 'CBS Sunday Morning' highlights sweet success » Yes, the American marriage equality fight is over—the rest is just bluster » Goodnight from the White House to your house  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/30/2006

Unsurprising yet still annoying development: All seven justices to decide on Mass. marriage vote

by Jeremy Hooper

 Courts Courtsandjudges Courts Supremejudicialcourt JcowinJudith Cowin (pic.), the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Justice who earlier today heard arguments on whether or not the high court should force a state vote on gay marriage, has decided that the full seven-member panel should join her in deciding on the matter.

The full court hearing will be held on December 20 -- just five shopping around discriminatory bullsh*t days before Christmas!

Entire SJC To Hear Arguments On Gay Marriage Vote [AP via CBS 4]

Technorati Tags: , ,

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails