Unsurprising yet still annoying development: All seven justices to decide on Mass. marriage vote - Good As You:: Gay and Lesbian Activism With a Sense of Humor

RECENT	POSTS:	» Report: IL has votes to free itself from marital discrimination's slipping grips » David Barton: AIDS, meningitis are gay people's 'due penalties' » Are gay boys not boys? A look at the cruelty the equal Scouting opponents engender » Audio: The time VA Lt. Gov candidate E.W. Jackson directly connected gays to pedophiles » MassResistance: NOM a 'no-show' in Illinois » FRC quite literally pitting God against little boys who happen to be gay, good at knot-tying » Anti–equal Scouting coalition: All signs point toward fairness, but trust us—discrimination is right » And now in news for the naive: As long as gay scouts are banned, boys won't discuss sex » Supposedly marriage-focused NOM promotes Boy Scouts discrimination » Married gay celeb challenges misconceptions, elementary-level spelling errors

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/30/2006

Unsurprising yet still annoying development: All seven justices to decide on Mass. marriage vote

by Jeremy Hooper

Courts Courtsandjudges Courts Supremejudicialcourt Jcowin Judith Cowin (pic.), the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Justice who earlier today heard arguments on whether or not the high court should force a state vote on gay marriage, has decided that the full seven-member panel should join her in deciding on the matter.

The full court hearing will be held on December 20 -- just five shopping around discriminatory bullsh*t days before Christmas!

Entire SJC To Hear Arguments On Gay Marriage Vote [AP via CBS 4]

Technorati Tags: gay marriage, Massachusetts, Mitt Romney

space

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy

If-It's-A-Choice-Hooper-Book

Reminisce:

>Search Site:

Advertising Info

Gay-Blogads

Related Posts with Thumbnails