RECENT  POSTS:  » Man who insinuated it's better to be thrown into sea than support homosexuality attended #SB101 signing ceremony » Considering vast (and frankly odd) amount of time he spends talking about us, no wonder Tony Perkins thinks we're 'special' » FRC keeps lying about where majority of Americans stand on marriage equality » Audio: Indiana restaurant owner openly discriminates against gays, glad to have added protection to do so » Indiana legislature, Gov. Pence awaken a fierce, powerful, anti-discrimination giant » Eleven Republican US Sens. give anti-gay conservatives a taste of a near and less divisive future » NOM proudly touts #March4Marriage backers who believe homosexuality 'should be treated by society as immoral, dangerous perversion' » Video: Gee, with compelling videos like this one, I just can't imagine why the anti-gay right is losing in court » #TBT: Even after legal equality, Americans—and particularly religious Americans—struggle to accept certain marriages » Indiana threatens its commerce, tourism dollars, reputation, general welfare of its citizenry  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

12/20/2006

An 'appeal'ing move: CA Supremes to hear marriage case

by Jeremy Hooper

02Flag - Cali (Rough Pastel)The California Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal of an October court ruling, in which those judges erred ruled 2-1 that California marriage laws don't discriminate because gays and lesbians already get most of the rights of marriage conferred by the state to heterosexual married couples.

In order to help this higher court not make the same mistake as their lower court buddies, we just want to remind them of two terms:

Picture 2-49
Picture 3-41

Please study them. Thanks.

State Supreme Court To Hear Gay-Marriage Challenge [AP via NBCSandiego.com]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails