RECENT  POSTS:  » AG Holder: 'Marriage equality is an idea whose time has come.' » Viciously anti-gay activist Scott Lively to help us show SCOTUS what animus looks like; thanks, doll! » Audio: NOM prez equates his anti-gay fight with defeating slavery, conquering 'evils that were occurring in the Roman empire' » SCOTUS deals another blow to NOM; more to surely come! » Federal judge strikes Nebraska's discriminatory marriage ban » CA Republicans of 2015 do thing that will make CA Republicans of 2025 say, 'Yeah. Okay. so?' » NC activists choose name that sounds like Lifetime movie, plot that's discriminatory » Video: Man who's directly compared homosexuality to pedophilia will now lecture you on extremism » The 'why can't they take their business elsewhere?' line: Not only offensive but legally meaningless » FRC's ridiculously bunk new poll (*from partisan polling firm)  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

12/20/2006

An 'appeal'ing move: CA Supremes to hear marriage case

by Jeremy Hooper

02Flag - Cali (Rough Pastel)The California Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal of an October court ruling, in which those judges erred ruled 2-1 that California marriage laws don't discriminate because gays and lesbians already get most of the rights of marriage conferred by the state to heterosexual married couples.

In order to help this higher court not make the same mistake as their lower court buddies, we just want to remind them of two terms:

Picture 2-49
Picture 3-41

Please study them. Thanks.

State Supreme Court To Hear Gay-Marriage Challenge [AP via NBCSandiego.com]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails