RECENT  POSTS:  » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win.  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

12/20/2006

An 'appeal'ing move: CA Supremes to hear marriage case

by Jeremy Hooper

02Flag - Cali (Rough Pastel)The California Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal of an October court ruling, in which those judges erred ruled 2-1 that California marriage laws don't discriminate because gays and lesbians already get most of the rights of marriage conferred by the state to heterosexual married couples.

In order to help this higher court not make the same mistake as their lower court buddies, we just want to remind them of two terms:

Picture 2-49
Picture 3-41

Please study them. Thanks.

State Supreme Court To Hear Gay-Marriage Challenge [AP via NBCSandiego.com]

space gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails