RECENT  POSTS:  » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama » In 2008, the AFA was the same on LGBT rights as President Obama; and I was a flying unicorn  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/22/2007

Ruling: City of brotherly love right to nab foes of gay love

by Jeremy Hooper

Protest1A federal judge has ruled that Philadelphia police officers did not act inappropriately or violate civil rights when they arrested a group of anti-gay demonstrators at a 2004 gay pride celebration (see link for back story).

In a related story, we hear Friday's ruling is believed to be the first time in history that someone in a room with the demonstrators acted in a more judgmental manner than they.

Court rejects gay foes' arrest suit [Phil. Daily News]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails