RECENT  POSTS:  » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs » The religious anti-gay crowd: They never understood the marriage fight; now they don't understand their loss  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

02/07/2007

Video: Yet another researcher rebukes Dobson's 'Focus'

by Jeremy Hooper

Wayne Besen's Truth Wins Out organization has released another video regarding the way James Dobson misrepresented research in a recent Time magazine commentary:

So let's see here -- of the two researchers Dobson quoted in his Time piece, how many have now spoken out against his misuse of THEIR work? Oh yea, that's right -- BOTH OF THEM!!

How embarassing!

So before you get any ideas, Mr. D, we want to go ahead and let you know that this Doc's chants of "hi ho" ...

Doc

...have nothing to do with the way he perceives the loose morals of American women!

TWO Releases YouTube Video Of Yale Professor Asserting Focus On The Family Leader James Dobson Distorted His Research [TWO]

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

No one is commenting on this? TSK...TSK...Dobson. He is so ready to skew scientific research for his own agenda, and yet when those who did the research wish to talk with him, he refuses to, and calls them liberals, working for the homo-genda (that works doesn't it?). Why bother using a persons research if they are just going to refute what you have to say? It is rather sad really. Why is he allowed to write for TIME? To sell more copies to the nazivangicals I suppose. I know name calling is low, but I feel sometimes as if they prefer I was hiding in the wall eating mouse poop.

Posted by: Matthew | Feb 7, 2007 4:22:56 PM

Oh! I love this professor! So nice to hear someone talk reasonably about families and children.

Posted by: Dash | Feb 8, 2007 1:33:58 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails