RECENT  POSTS:  » Joseph Farah still clueless about nondiscrimination law » Hobby Lobby president to join extremely anti-gay activists at 'Star Spangled' event » FRC's Sprigg admits his side put up 'weak defense' in 7th Circuit » Photo: The latest totally convincing, in no way silly attempt at a meme from anti-gay Ruth Institute » AFA's Fischer: Time for Christians to 'get up in somebody's grill' like Jesus would » GLAAD: The World Congress of Families sparks protests in Australia. Let's examine why. » GLAAD: NOM cofounder: 'Hard to see... the logical stopping place' between gay-affirming, murder-affirming Christians » 'Nonpartisan' NOM's entrenched Republicanism again showing » GLAAD: His other tactics failing, NOM president turns to anti-trans fear-mongering » AFA's Bryan Fischer: Diversity is 'most sinister and dangerous lie'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

02/07/2007

Video: Yet another researcher rebukes Dobson's 'Focus'

by Jeremy Hooper

Wayne Besen's Truth Wins Out organization has released another video regarding the way James Dobson misrepresented research in a recent Time magazine commentary:

So let's see here -- of the two researchers Dobson quoted in his Time piece, how many have now spoken out against his misuse of THEIR work? Oh yea, that's right -- BOTH OF THEM!!

How embarassing!

So before you get any ideas, Mr. D, we want to go ahead and let you know that this Doc's chants of "hi ho" ...

Doc

...have nothing to do with the way he perceives the loose morals of American women!

TWO Releases YouTube Video Of Yale Professor Asserting Focus On The Family Leader James Dobson Distorted His Research [TWO]

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

No one is commenting on this? TSK...TSK...Dobson. He is so ready to skew scientific research for his own agenda, and yet when those who did the research wish to talk with him, he refuses to, and calls them liberals, working for the homo-genda (that works doesn't it?). Why bother using a persons research if they are just going to refute what you have to say? It is rather sad really. Why is he allowed to write for TIME? To sell more copies to the nazivangicals I suppose. I know name calling is low, but I feel sometimes as if they prefer I was hiding in the wall eating mouse poop.

Posted by: Matthew | Feb 7, 2007 4:22:56 PM

Oh! I love this professor! So nice to hear someone talk reasonably about families and children.

Posted by: Dash | Feb 8, 2007 1:33:58 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails