RECENT  POSTS:  » Joseph Farah still clueless about nondiscrimination law » Hobby Lobby president to join extremely anti-gay activists at 'Star Spangled' event » FRC's Sprigg admits his side put up 'weak defense' in 7th Circuit » Photo: The latest totally convincing, in no way silly attempt at a meme from anti-gay Ruth Institute » AFA's Fischer: Time for Christians to 'get up in somebody's grill' like Jesus would » GLAAD: The World Congress of Families sparks protests in Australia. Let's examine why. » GLAAD: NOM cofounder: 'Hard to see... the logical stopping place' between gay-affirming, murder-affirming Christians » 'Nonpartisan' NOM's entrenched Republicanism again showing » GLAAD: His other tactics failing, NOM president turns to anti-trans fear-mongering » AFA's Bryan Fischer: Diversity is 'most sinister and dangerous lie'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/13/2007

Forgive me father, for I have voted against the Federal Marriage Amendment

by Jeremy Hooper

Popesay-1

In a newly released document, the Pope has declared that all Catholic politicians have a "non-negotiable" moral duty to oppose same-sex marriage (among other cultural "issues").

Because, of course, a God who gave you the capacity to reason and question the realities of the world would never want you negotiate actuality with multi-translated text that's been written and interpreted by man. That capacity for rational thought that you posses? Yea, that was just put there for decoration, kind of like your uvula or appendix.

::Massive eye roll; dramatic head shake::

It remans to be seen if any Catholic politicians will follow this papal proclamation and drop their support for marriage equality. Just to be safe, we've sent all Catholic Democrats a memo wishing them a happy April Fools Day.

Catholic politicians can't back gay marriage: Pope [Reuters]

Technorati Tags:

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

The Pope is such a joke. He needs a "Queer Eye" intervention and soon. I just can't take him too seriously anymore dressing in robes and satin shoes. The whole concept of what he stands for is shameful, false, and outdated.

Posted by: | Mar 13, 2007 12:12:09 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails