RECENT  POSTS:  » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama » In 2008, the AFA was the same on LGBT rights as President Obama; and I was a flying unicorn » The Hitching Post plot thickens in a truly remarkable way » On Rivka, Robert and their dirty, self-victimizing, anti-intellectual blame game » POTUS believes in fifty-state equality, happy with way it's playing out » But your subjective view of 'real' marriage is factually irrelevant, Ryan » Flip Benham (yes, their dad) reportedly protesting outside NC weddings » TV's Duggar family continues anti-LGBT activism » Caught ya: Far-right's latest marriage 'victim' edited website to make more solid legal case » Read: Wyoming to become our 32nd marriage equality state  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/13/2007

Forgive me father, for I have voted against the Federal Marriage Amendment

by Jeremy Hooper

Popesay-1

In a newly released document, the Pope has declared that all Catholic politicians have a "non-negotiable" moral duty to oppose same-sex marriage (among other cultural "issues").

Because, of course, a God who gave you the capacity to reason and question the realities of the world would never want you negotiate actuality with multi-translated text that's been written and interpreted by man. That capacity for rational thought that you posses? Yea, that was just put there for decoration, kind of like your uvula or appendix.

::Massive eye roll; dramatic head shake::

It remans to be seen if any Catholic politicians will follow this papal proclamation and drop their support for marriage equality. Just to be safe, we've sent all Catholic Democrats a memo wishing them a happy April Fools Day.

Catholic politicians can't back gay marriage: Pope [Reuters]

Technorati Tags:

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

The Pope is such a joke. He needs a "Queer Eye" intervention and soon. I just can't take him too seriously anymore dressing in robes and satin shoes. The whole concept of what he stands for is shameful, false, and outdated.

Posted by: | Mar 13, 2007 12:12:09 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails