RECENT  POSTS:  » Apple CEO gives 'substantial' sum to HRC's southern state project; may or may not have used ApplePay » Conservative proposes new way for vendors to tell gay customers they don't care for them » NOM versus David Koch » Anti-equality baseball player calls reporter 'a prick' for asking about his anti-equality advocacy » Audio: Josh Duggar defends discrimination, invalidates own point » Audio: AFA's Fischer names 'homosexual agenda' as 'greatest threat to liberty' in American history » Audio: AFA Radio caller calls for executing gays; FRC-employed host doesn't even challenge him, much less condemn » NOM president's other organization is 'in trouble' (his words) too » FRC prays to take LGBT Americans out of nondiscrimination law » In lieu of typing 'Look how desperate we are' over and over again, NOM president wrote this instead  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/13/2007

Forgive me father, for I have voted against the Federal Marriage Amendment

by Jeremy Hooper

Popesay-1

In a newly released document, the Pope has declared that all Catholic politicians have a "non-negotiable" moral duty to oppose same-sex marriage (among other cultural "issues").

Because, of course, a God who gave you the capacity to reason and question the realities of the world would never want you negotiate actuality with multi-translated text that's been written and interpreted by man. That capacity for rational thought that you posses? Yea, that was just put there for decoration, kind of like your uvula or appendix.

::Massive eye roll; dramatic head shake::

It remans to be seen if any Catholic politicians will follow this papal proclamation and drop their support for marriage equality. Just to be safe, we've sent all Catholic Democrats a memo wishing them a happy April Fools Day.

Catholic politicians can't back gay marriage: Pope [Reuters]

Technorati Tags:

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

The Pope is such a joke. He needs a "Queer Eye" intervention and soon. I just can't take him too seriously anymore dressing in robes and satin shoes. The whole concept of what he stands for is shameful, false, and outdated.

Posted by: | Mar 13, 2007 12:12:09 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails