RECENT  POSTS:  » Joseph Farah still clueless about nondiscrimination law » Hobby Lobby president to join extremely anti-gay activists at 'Star Spangled' event » FRC's Sprigg admits his side put up 'weak defense' in 7th Circuit » Photo: The latest totally convincing, in no way silly attempt at a meme from anti-gay Ruth Institute » AFA's Fischer: Time for Christians to 'get up in somebody's grill' like Jesus would » GLAAD: The World Congress of Families sparks protests in Australia. Let's examine why. » GLAAD: NOM cofounder: 'Hard to see... the logical stopping place' between gay-affirming, murder-affirming Christians » 'Nonpartisan' NOM's entrenched Republicanism again showing » GLAAD: His other tactics failing, NOM president turns to anti-trans fear-mongering » AFA's Bryan Fischer: Diversity is 'most sinister and dangerous lie'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/14/2007

'Radar' on prenatal gaydar

by Jeremy Hooper

Picture 10-25Last week, we briefly showed you how Southern Baptist Theological Seminary president Albert Mohler Jr was expressing support for any and all medical treatment to change one's sexuality from gay to straight, should a biological basis for sexuality ever be found. Well, the Radar magazine piece that inspired Mohler's frightening comments has now been posted online in its entirety:

Is Your Baby Gay? [Radar]

Oh, and one more thing: if you have to even ask yourself whether or not you would terminate a pregnancy solely because you knew the child would become gay, then please go away and never visit this site again. Your traffic just isn't worth it.

**Actually on second thought: Please stay, as you are most likely the type of person who needs to hear a pro-gay message more than anyone.

Technorati Tags:

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

But I thought you were supportive of a woman's right to have an abortion at any time, for any reason.

Posted by: | Mar 14, 2007 2:26:44 PM

Well I don't know why you would assume that, as we've almost never addressed the topic of abortion. And while we won't get into the politics of a woman's right to choose, as that is not the "culture war issue" with which we deal, we will say unapologetically: We will never be supportive of the kind of woman -- whether she has the right or not -- who has an abortion for the sole reason that the child would've been gay.

Posted by: G-A-Y | Mar 14, 2007 2:36:36 PM

I would have thought that the women considering such things would have been exactly the sort you'd want revisiting... After all, there's very little point in constantly preaching to the choir...

Posted by: Anon | Mar 14, 2007 3:22:23 PM

You're actually right, and an update has been added to reflect that.

Posted by: G-A-Y | Mar 14, 2007 3:24:41 PM

Wow, Thank god I live in the EU/UK.

You have some scary people living over there.

If this nonsense was even suggested over here, the baptist oaf would be hauled off by the politically correct police, and rightly so.

Hitler already tried what he desires.

Posted by: Derek North | Mar 14, 2007 3:58:32 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails