RECENT  POSTS:  » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs » The religious anti-gay crowd: They never understood the marriage fight; now they don't understand their loss  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/07/2007

Wait, could the religious right actually be wrong about our parental ability?

by Jeremy Hooper

Baby2A newly released Canadian study suggests that same-sex couples are just as, if not more, adept at raising "socially competent" children:

Study: Same-sex couples just as good, if not better, at parenting [Canada.com]

And why are these kids sometimes more well-adjusted socially, you ask? Well, isn't it obvious? While kids of heterosexual parents are forced to dedicate two days a year to celebrating their parents, kids o' gays are able to consolidate their parental celebrations into one Mothers/Fathers Day blowout. That extra day to focus on social competency gives them just a little bit of an edge over their reared-by-'rosexual peers. Obviously.

Or, it could just be that gays aren't the child destroying, society corrupting, evil demon spawn that so many have accused them of being, but are instead good people who are just as capable of proficient kid rearing as anyone else. We're open to both options; although we must admit we think the Mother/Fathers Day thing might really be something! Hell, just think of the vital social betterment time that you save on greeting cards alone...

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Could it possibly be that gay people aren't so wrapped up in teaching their children how to be so full of bigoted hate that they must turn it upon themselves that children actually can have some self-esteem, rather than self-loathing? Could it be that the time that isn't wasted on frantic protection of gender roles is spent learning to enjoy life and learning make for good kids? Then again, maybe it is that children of gay people have a better chance of a well decorated home.

"what's that, darling, you don't want to finish re-wiring antique lamps while listening to Aida with Daddy?" "You want to play baseball and Papa us too busy laying out the Spring color beds?" "Well, darling, call aunties Melissa and Colette; I'm sure they'd love to play ball with you and I'll come watch."

Posted by: ptboat67 | May 8, 2007 9:29:27 AM

lol... My own personal theory to explain the data (if it needs explaining) is that there is a small but significant chance that a heterosexual household had their child by accident. These accidental babies would tend to skew their average down a little.

On the other hand, gay families have to plan *really hard* to have children - so there are never unwanted kids in those houses. So I would expect (all other things being equal) that the average gay household would have the same child-rearing competency as the average straight household who *planned their children carefully*.

(This is pure speculation... but it's what I would expect to be true.)

Posted by: Anon | May 9, 2007 3:30:16 AM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails