RECENT  POSTS:  » When it comes to bias, NOM hopes its caca will be good Garden State fertilizer » Video: You don't 'understand' us? Well here, let us translate: ☮, ♥, = » WND poll: Belying an entire movement's 'we're not anti-gay' rhetoric » Papal papers: Official Catholics vs. unacknowledged Catholic front group » Was that praying or preying, Wendster? » NOM: The worst New Jersey joke ever CONcocted » Culture Warrin' (G. Harding) » Audio: Thank you for your call, now let us denigrate your faith and 'lifestyle' » Gays, Gap, and 'Whateveryouwannakah': All euphemisms for evil, say anti-gay Mainers » Just head as far right as possible, and you too shall find it  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/19/2007

Giving 'Voice' to lil' queers

Picture 27-4Yesterday, we told you about New York magazine's lengthy examination into "The Science of Gaydar." Well, being that this is gay pride month and every NY publication must fill an LGBT quota or be run out of town by angry Chelsea boys, we'd today like to direct you to The Village Voice, who is this week meeting their demand by running a feature on "The Science of Being Gay Even Before Kindergarten":

Queer in the Crib [Village Voice]

So now we've had Manhattan-based publications cover the science behind both gaydar and gay kiddies. So you know what that means, The New Yorker: That just leaves "The Science of Gay Intellectuals With a Flair for Upscale, Elite (some would say pretentious and myopic) World Views." We're not sure where you'll ever be able to find subjects for research, but we'll be expecting your report before 7/1.

gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-AddThis Feed Button gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Talk to us






*Why are my comments not appearing? See the G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails