RECENT  POSTS:  » Your daily 'Gay Gestapo' moment with the American Family Association's senior analyst » Scott Lively equates accurately noting his public record with inciting murder » Audio: Mark Regnerus doesn't think marriage equality has 'a lot of gas left' » Friday: NOM president shares the bill with 'ex-gay' activists » Today in 'um, yeah, obviously': Stunt marriages not confined to opposite-sex partnerships » Video: Brian Brown's fellow panelist gives insight into Moscow panel's extreme views on homosexuality, marriage » Video: TN man condemns gays with Leviticus billboards; oddly allows local Red Lobsters to remain open » Video: 'Ex-gay' speaker at upcoming ERLC summit equates talking to gay people with talking to cancer patients » GLAAD: Mainstream media is catching on to NOM's broader agenda » FRC's Values Voter Summit puts anti-gay bakers on a marriage panel; so we won, basically  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

06/19/2007

NY assembles equality groundwork; waits for Senate to take it apart

by Jeremy Hooper

Ny MarriageThe New York state Assembly Judiciary Committee yesterday advanced a gay marriage bill by a 16-5 party line vote, and it is being reported that the full Assembly is scheduled to take up the proposal today. And happily, it's predicted that the nuptials-legalizing measure will have the 76 votes necessary to pass through that chamber:

Assembly Set To Approve Gay Marriage [NY Sun]

In less happy news, however, the Republican-controlled Senate still seems to be a ways away from advancing the measure and making NY the second state in the nation with marriage equality. But then again, that only makes sense, as it is the "Sin, it" mentality that has us gays still fighting this ridiculous "battle" in the first place!

Our (non-ring-adorned) fingers remain crossed for a Senate surprise!

**UPDATE: Well, so much for that surprise; it's even worse than we thought in the Senate. Majority leader Joseph Bruno (R) said today:

We’re not going to take a vote; we have too many other issues,” ... “We’re not going to spend hours debating an issue that, you know, is not going to be of consequence.

Not going to be of consequence?! Oy vey.

Bruno Says ‘We’re Not Doing Gay Marriage’ [NY Times --City Room]

**UPDATE2: NY Assembly does right thing; waits for Senate to do right wing thing [G-A-Y]

Technorati Tags: , ,

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

I'm holding my breath until I see what the Assembly will do.

Regarding the Senate, I'm not suprised and I think this is why 2008 will be so important. Bruno hasn't been bad concerning gay rights, but this may be too much for him and we will need a Democratic Senate to take the final step.

Posted by: Donald | Jun 19, 2007 5:37:07 PM

My partner and I am finally part of the human race according to the Assembly.

This is wonderful.....So wonderful.

Posted by: Donald | Jun 19, 2007 9:38:56 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails