Reason #141 why we screen cap ever comment we make

RECENT	POSTS:	» Culture Warrin' (G. Harding) » Audio: Thank you for your call, now let us denigrate your faith and 'lifestyle' » Gays, Gap, and 'Whateveryouwannakah': All euphemisms for evil, say anti-gay Mainers » Just head as far right as possible, and you too shall find it » Anti-gay punditry: Where gays' respectful words go to die, get reincarnated as hogwash » Well we would hate to be a headache, now wouldn't we? » Oh would you look at that? Hate crimes rose right alongside far-right's lies » D.C. Catholic BULLetins ratchet up first syllable » Happy Chanukah from Focus on the Family » Adam's bits cut for too closely showing dancer if his own bits are

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/17/2007

You know what's really annoying? When you try and talk sense to your opposition, but it is received about as well as piss in the wind.

Latest case in point: Yesterday, angered by the way our opposition continues to sidestep the true issues playing out in an Ocean Grove, NJ, civil unions situation, we left this comment on a One News Now story:

Picture 6-78

Nothing offensive about our words at all, just an attempt to represent the actuality of the matter. So we never for a second thought it would be denied. However, head over to the ONN comments section and see if you can find our words (which we made yesterday at 2:45 PM) anywhere.

Do you see it anywhere? No, you don't. That's because ONN has apparently deemed in some sort of violation. Most likely that violation is against the one-sided bubble in which they like to shroud their stories. For reasoned consideration of issues is even more frightening to these kids than gay monogamy!

But that's okay, One (sided) News Now. We know the truth, and we will continue to speak out against your ways. After all, what you're NOT showing your readers is far more telling than what you are!

UMC organization files lawsuit against NJ over civil-union issue [ONN]