RECENT  POSTS:  » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/18/2007

MD gays dealt blow; job now is to lobby lawmakers

by Jeremy Hooper

Maryland_flag_2 In a 4-3 decision, Maryland's Court of Appeals today overturned Judge M. Brooke Murdock's 2006 ruling that the state's 1973 law banning same-sex marriage "cannot withstand constitutional challenge."  The majority of the highest court found that there is no fundamental right to marry a person of the same sex:

Maryland High Court Upholds Same-Sex Marriage Ban [WaPo]

Enragingly, the majority opinion glossed over the very real discrimination that is at play via marriage inequality, refusing to acknowledge gay people as a "suspect class."  It also used the tired, flawed argument that man/woman-only marriage fosters procreation and encourages the "traditional family structure."  In fact, if we didn't know any better, we might think James Dobson wrote the opinion himself, as many "pro-family" talking points are accepted and parroted in the majority's ruling. 

So once again, we find ourselves proud members of a minority, the likes of which is being kept down by the short-sighted outlooks of a majority.  If we weren't 100% sure that gay couples everywhere will have the last laugh in the very near future, then we might be uncontrollably distraught by this ruling.  Instead, we are just moderately pissed that Maryland's traditional gay family structures will just have to jump through a few more unnecessary hoops before they reach their inevitable brass ring. 

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Why should the next step be to lobby lawmakers? Why not work on convincing the electorate? If a majority of Maryland citizens are convinced of the justice of your cause, sympathetic legislators will be elected.

The assistant attorney general was correct when he said, "An invalidation of Maryland's law would have the unfortunate consequence of placing these issues outside the arena of public debate, outside the legislative and democratic process."

Why do gay-rights advocates show such contempt for their fellow citizens?

Posted by: David | Sep 18, 2007 10:51:46 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails