RECENT  POSTS:  » Where art thou, Jeremy? » Video: Ad for blemish remover/ tourist spot for our new, bettered America » Whether justified or Kim Davis-ed, individualistic rage rarely outplays broader truths » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »


NY Supremes court righteousness, toss attempts to bastardize it

by Jeremy Hooper

Picture 17-20We've just received word from our friends at the Empire State Pride Agenda that the New York state Supreme Court has upheld the state comptroller' 2004 decision to treat out-of-state marriages of same-sex couples the same as any other legal marriage in terms of benefits afforded to state employees through the New York State Retirement System.

A decision that is ironically satisfying on a personal level, as we were just asking ourselves this morning, "Self -- why the heck did we choose to plant this site's roots here in NY rather than, say, Little Rock?" So thanks, state officials and judges, for reminding us why the heck societal progression and non-hostile governance seem far more likely here than in many of our other great states (even if we do have a ways to go before we're fully equal)!

What's even more lovely about the decision is that in casting it, the court dismissed a challenge from the militantly anti-gay legal beagles at the Alliance Defense Fund. And considering their nonstop attempts to foist their one-sided, Biblical-based anti-gay lifestyles onto society, any of their court losses make us squeal with delight!

So all in all -- a very nice development along the Empire State's inevitable granting of marriage equality to gays (be they state employees or not). Here's just hoping that by the time any gay person under that age of 50 60 62 64.5 reaches the common time of retirement, such non-issues will become non-debatatable.

McNamara Decision and Order.pdf McNamara Decision (pdf) [Empire State Pride Agenda]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper

Your thoughts

Note that the New York Supreme Court is the lowest court of general jusrisdiction in the state, not, as one would assume. the highest. This decision is a trial court decision, not the affirmation by the highest court (the New York Court of Appeals). A common mistake.

Posted by: Jim Kellogg | Sep 12, 2007 3:11:58 PM

Jim: Yes, you are correct. And not sure if you are implying that we made a mistake by implying otherwise, but we certainly didn't mean to do so.

Posted by: G-A-Y | Sep 12, 2007 3:15:23 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy

Related Posts with Thumbnails