RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/19/2007

Video: Semi-Live Streaming the 'Values Voters' Summit (Pt. 11)

by Jeremy Hooper

When watching this, please remember that conservative stalwart Phyllis Schlafly (like so many social conservatives) has a gay son:

Ms. Schlafly has said many times in the press that she wishes people would stop bringing up that she has an openly gay son. But you know what? We really wish that Phyllis, at 83 years of age, would finally stop bringing up that she views her gay son as a lesser than, second-class citizen whose love is unworthy of equal legal parity. We unfortunately can't always get what we want.

'Values Voters Summit' Coverage -- Clip 11 [YouTube]
**MORE: See Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8, Part 9, Part 10, Part 12, Part 13, Part 14, Part 15, & Wrap-Up

***NOTE: People For The American Way's "Right Wing Watch" blog is also covering the event. Check that out as well.

***NOTE 2: Time on video should actually be more like 8:30. The 7:45 was left over from the previous video.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Amazing that she can cite reference to the GAO report and the amount of rights that "husbands and wives" receive but she can't conceive of the fact that if she has her way, her son will never be able to get those benefits with his partner.

Posted by: Daimeon | Oct 20, 2007 3:27:46 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails