RECENT  POSTS:  » Sen. Manchin picks odd way to (D-istinguish) himself » Photo: Before city council votes on nondiscrimination, Charlotte anti-LGBT activists frame us as 'Homo-Nazis' » AG Holder: 'Marriage equality is an idea whose time has come.' » Viciously anti-gay activist Scott Lively to help us show SCOTUS what animus looks like; thanks, doll! » Audio: NOM prez equates his anti-gay fight with defeating slavery, conquering 'evils that were occurring in the Roman empire' » SCOTUS deals another blow to NOM; more to surely come! » Federal judge strikes Nebraska's discriminatory marriage ban » CA Republicans of 2015 do thing that will make CA Republicans of 2025 say, 'Yeah. Okay. so?' » NC activists choose name that sounds like Lifetime movie, plot that's discriminatory » Video: Man who's directly compared homosexuality to pedophilia will now lecture you on extremism  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/05/2007

Video: The 'special' way they muddy facts

by Jeremy Hooper

This anti-ENDA video, part of Focus on the Family's "Stoplight" series, has been around for a bit. However, since it (a) just became embeddable on YouTube, and (b) once again exemplifies the duplicity of FOF, we thought we'd show it to you:

Okay, so obviously the whole thing is misleading, at best. But for a clear-cut, easy to understand example of how these guys misrepresent, just listen to what Stuart says beginning around the 1:42 mark. Do you see what he oh-so-cleverly does here? He says that the "The key phrase in the bill says it provides special protections for 'actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity.'" He just casually asks the listener to accept that what he's saying is factual. So if you don't know any better, it 100% sounds like the "special protections" part is included in the bill's language. However, it is ABSOLUTELY NOT! Go read it for yourself. All it does is grant employment protections on the basis of "actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity," in much the same way the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 protects individuals who are 40 years of age or older; the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 prohibits employment discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities in the private sector, and in state and local governments; etc, etc. There is absolutely no "special protection" written or implied by the ACTUAL BILL LANGUAGE!

But then again, who the hell looks at a thing like the legislation's actual text when talking about the legislation?!? ::sigh::

ENDA Liberty [YouTube]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails