RECENT  POSTS:  » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/05/2007

Video: The 'special' way they muddy facts

by Jeremy Hooper

This anti-ENDA video, part of Focus on the Family's "Stoplight" series, has been around for a bit. However, since it (a) just became embeddable on YouTube, and (b) once again exemplifies the duplicity of FOF, we thought we'd show it to you:

Okay, so obviously the whole thing is misleading, at best. But for a clear-cut, easy to understand example of how these guys misrepresent, just listen to what Stuart says beginning around the 1:42 mark. Do you see what he oh-so-cleverly does here? He says that the "The key phrase in the bill says it provides special protections for 'actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity.'" He just casually asks the listener to accept that what he's saying is factual. So if you don't know any better, it 100% sounds like the "special protections" part is included in the bill's language. However, it is ABSOLUTELY NOT! Go read it for yourself. All it does is grant employment protections on the basis of "actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity," in much the same way the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 protects individuals who are 40 years of age or older; the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 prohibits employment discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities in the private sector, and in state and local governments; etc, etc. There is absolutely no "special protection" written or implied by the ACTUAL BILL LANGUAGE!

But then again, who the hell looks at a thing like the legislation's actual text when talking about the legislation?!? ::sigh::

ENDA Liberty [YouTube]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails