RECENT  POSTS:  » Watch live at 11:30 ET: NOM's hilariously out of touch (and likely final) #March4Marriage » READ: Very anti-gay crew vows to never recognize civil marriage equality (even though they so will or face penalties) » NOM #March4Marriage coalition partner, religious liaison: 'Homosexuality is behavior and choice...immoral' » Mike Huckabee blatantly lies about something no civil marriage activist is seeking » Video: Man who once called for ban on gay teachers promotes #March4Marriage; because of course he does » FRC Senior Fellow: We are prepared to 'give our lives' to fight same-sex marriage (i.e. 'our eternal destruction') » Questions 'Face The Nation' should ask Tony Perkins (but likely won't, sadly) » Gorgeous clip from PFLAG Canada recognizes the many marriage memories that never were » On marriage, FRC prays SCOTUS will 'rule in the fear of the Lord' » AFA's new desperation: Marriage equality will turn bible into 'Mein Kampf'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/05/2007

Video: The 'special' way they muddy facts

by Jeremy Hooper

This anti-ENDA video, part of Focus on the Family's "Stoplight" series, has been around for a bit. However, since it (a) just became embeddable on YouTube, and (b) once again exemplifies the duplicity of FOF, we thought we'd show it to you:

Okay, so obviously the whole thing is misleading, at best. But for a clear-cut, easy to understand example of how these guys misrepresent, just listen to what Stuart says beginning around the 1:42 mark. Do you see what he oh-so-cleverly does here? He says that the "The key phrase in the bill says it provides special protections for 'actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity.'" He just casually asks the listener to accept that what he's saying is factual. So if you don't know any better, it 100% sounds like the "special protections" part is included in the bill's language. However, it is ABSOLUTELY NOT! Go read it for yourself. All it does is grant employment protections on the basis of "actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity," in much the same way the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 protects individuals who are 40 years of age or older; the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 prohibits employment discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities in the private sector, and in state and local governments; etc, etc. There is absolutely no "special protection" written or implied by the ACTUAL BILL LANGUAGE!

But then again, who the hell looks at a thing like the legislation's actual text when talking about the legislation?!? ::sigh::

ENDA Liberty [YouTube]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails