RECENT  POSTS:  » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists' » In which another anti-gay group forces politicos to Gladys Kravitz our way into one family's divorce drama » In 2008, the AFA was the same on LGBT rights as President Obama; and I was a flying unicorn » The Hitching Post plot thickens in a truly remarkable way  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/23/2007

White House: No Gay-Centric Veto Left Behind

by Jeremy Hooper

Following speculation from "anti-gay" activists like Peter LaBarbera that Pres. Bush might sign ENDA (The Employment Non-Discrimination Act) if it made it to his desk, the White House has issues a statement saying that "[t]he bill raises concerns on constitutional and policy grounds, and if H.R. 3685 were presented to the President, his senior advisors would recommend that he veto the bill":

STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATION POLICY -- ENDA (pdf) [White House]

First an announcement that you'd nix a measure that protects gays from hate crimes, and now the revelation that you'll kill a bill that'd help eliminate workplace discrimination. Is there some sort of competition for most misguided usage of vetoes for which you kids are bucking, or do you really just not care for gay people?! Sheesh.

In the memo, the White House staffers cite as reasons why they want the measure vetoed such fallacious things as the supposed burdening of religious freedom that they feel the bill would introduce, as well as the provisions that they feel would weaken DOMA (with them even using the words "sanctity of marriage" in the release). In fact, upon reading it, we hear all of the nation's most rabidly anti-gay groups silenced all fears that they'd be facing a hiring crisis come January 2009.

**UPDATE: Earlier today we saw CWA's Matt Barber outline his flawed reasons why ENDA should be vetoed. Quite tellingly, it seems Bush & Co. have appeased his mind:

CWA Thanks President Bush for ENDA Veto Pledge [CWA]

**UPDATE2: PageOne Q is now ever-so-subtly reporting that the House ENDA vote, originally scheduled for tomorrow, has been delayed:

Picture 12-32

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails