RECENT  POSTS:  » GLAAD: Questions we'd like reporters to ask at the Values Voter Summit » HA! Robert Oscar Lopez mentions me in truly bizarre amicus brief to 5th Circuit » Gay man realizes he shouldn't have entered an opposite-sex union—so no same-sex marriage for anyone?! » Your daily 'Gay Gestapo' moment with the American Family Association's senior analyst » Scott Lively equates accurately noting his public record with inciting murder » Audio: Mark Regnerus doesn't think marriage equality has 'a lot of gas left' » Friday: NOM president shares the bill with 'ex-gay' activists » Today in 'um, yeah, obviously': Stunt marriages not confined to opposite-sex partnerships » Video: Brian Brown's fellow panelist gives insight into Moscow panel's extreme views on homosexuality, marriage » Video: TN man condemns gays with Leviticus billboards; oddly allows local Red Lobsters to remain open  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/23/2007

White House: No Gay-Centric Veto Left Behind

by Jeremy Hooper

Following speculation from "anti-gay" activists like Peter LaBarbera that Pres. Bush might sign ENDA (The Employment Non-Discrimination Act) if it made it to his desk, the White House has issues a statement saying that "[t]he bill raises concerns on constitutional and policy grounds, and if H.R. 3685 were presented to the President, his senior advisors would recommend that he veto the bill":

STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATION POLICY -- ENDA (pdf) [White House]

First an announcement that you'd nix a measure that protects gays from hate crimes, and now the revelation that you'll kill a bill that'd help eliminate workplace discrimination. Is there some sort of competition for most misguided usage of vetoes for which you kids are bucking, or do you really just not care for gay people?! Sheesh.

In the memo, the White House staffers cite as reasons why they want the measure vetoed such fallacious things as the supposed burdening of religious freedom that they feel the bill would introduce, as well as the provisions that they feel would weaken DOMA (with them even using the words "sanctity of marriage" in the release). In fact, upon reading it, we hear all of the nation's most rabidly anti-gay groups silenced all fears that they'd be facing a hiring crisis come January 2009.

**UPDATE: Earlier today we saw CWA's Matt Barber outline his flawed reasons why ENDA should be vetoed. Quite tellingly, it seems Bush & Co. have appeased his mind:

CWA Thanks President Bush for ENDA Veto Pledge [CWA]

**UPDATE2: PageOne Q is now ever-so-subtly reporting that the House ENDA vote, originally scheduled for tomorrow, has been delayed:

Picture 12-32

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails