RECENT  POSTS:  » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs » The religious anti-gay crowd: They never understood the marriage fight; now they don't understand their loss  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

11/27/2007

Grown adults go to court against most vulnerable kids

by Jeremy Hooper

LegallyblechA "pro-family" group calling themselves the Advocates for Faith and Freedom has filed a lawsuit against the state of California over SB 777, the recently-passed law that protects gay students from discrimination:

Christian group sues over California student-discrimination law [AP via Mercury News]

And to understand just how little merit this legal group's case has, you don't have to do a ton of research. In fact, you can consider just these two lines from their complaint (pdf) to see the sort of mentality at play:

This provision is unconstitutionally vague because it places an educator in the impossible position of knowing whether an instruction or activity “promotes a discriminatory bias.” For example, any curriculum or instruction that pre-assumes the existence of a mother and father in a family relationship might be construed to promote a discriminatory bias against persons choosing alternative relationships.

For you see, they are working from the place that says mothers and fathers simply are existing, yet gay couples are "choosing alternative relationships." And this is the sort of mindset that underscores their entire complaint. They present homosexuality as a concept that exists outside of the realm of deserved equality and civility, instead using terms like "special treatment" to refer to those who have made this "choice." And they use the intellectually dishonest tactic of making it seem like they simply have no clue what does and does not constitute actual discrimination, as they attempt to muddy the waters between which side is throwing stones and which is getting hit.

But then again, the schoolyard bully never owned up to stealing our lunch money either.

Advocates for Faith and Freedom's lawsuit (pdf) [AFF]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Would that, by definition, make these people pro-discrimination?

Posted by: Brian | Nov 28, 2007 9:06:14 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails