RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

12/07/2007

MassResistance: Raising the bar on mature photo labeling

by Jeremy Hooper

Remember yesterday when we had a little fun with the labels that a Concerned Women For America staffer chose for a certain video clip? Well today we turn our attention to the anti-gay activists at MassResistance and their labels for some photos that they've posted to highlight a story.

For a photo outside of a courthouse, they use the appropriate and straightforward name:

Picture 4-100

For a photo of people carrying signs outside of the courthouse and another of plaintiffs standing in the lobby of the courthouse, they use these two labels:

Picture 6-97

Both perfectly fine and dandy. But then comes an image set featuring a photographer and reporter from the local gay newspaper, Bay Windows. On their site, MassResistance says of these photos:

Picture 5-94

Alright, fair enough. Ao the image names will of course be something along the lines of "photographer" and "reporter", right? Well, let's look. For the photographer, we have this:

Picture 7-81

But for the reporter. Well, the reporter gets this treatment:

Picture 8-66

LOL! It seems they were just so PISSED at the reporter for reporting, that they had to take their frustrations out via his photo's name. TAKE THAT, reporter -- you're a weasel! We got you! Nanny, nanny boo boo!

Guess we're just lucky that the photog wasn't deemed "Harlotwithazoomlens"!

David Parker federal civil rights appeal heard before 3-judge panel in Boston Federal Court [MassResistance]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Dang! you find the craziest stuff, I wish had your 'out of the box' kind of thinking.
That was a fun to read.

Posted by: ~Dawn | Dec 8, 2007 7:23:50 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails