RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: Voices from our pro-equality future (present?) » Anti-gay orgs continue to offend children of single parents, gay parents, more » Apple CEO gives 'substantial' sum to HRC's southern state project; may or may not have used ApplePay » Conservative proposes new way for vendors to tell gay customers they don't care for them » NOM versus David Koch » Anti-equality baseball player calls reporter 'a prick' for asking about his anti-equality advocacy » Audio: Josh Duggar defends discrimination, invalidates own point » Audio: AFA's Fischer names 'homosexual agenda' as 'greatest threat to liberty' in American history » Audio: AFA Radio caller calls for executing gays; FRC-employed host doesn't even challenge him, much less condemn » NOM president's other organization is 'in trouble' (his words) too  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

12/07/2007

MassResistance: Raising the bar on mature photo labeling

by Jeremy Hooper

Remember yesterday when we had a little fun with the labels that a Concerned Women For America staffer chose for a certain video clip? Well today we turn our attention to the anti-gay activists at MassResistance and their labels for some photos that they've posted to highlight a story.

For a photo outside of a courthouse, they use the appropriate and straightforward name:

Picture 4-100

For a photo of people carrying signs outside of the courthouse and another of plaintiffs standing in the lobby of the courthouse, they use these two labels:

Picture 6-97

Both perfectly fine and dandy. But then comes an image set featuring a photographer and reporter from the local gay newspaper, Bay Windows. On their site, MassResistance says of these photos:

Picture 5-94

Alright, fair enough. Ao the image names will of course be something along the lines of "photographer" and "reporter", right? Well, let's look. For the photographer, we have this:

Picture 7-81

But for the reporter. Well, the reporter gets this treatment:

Picture 8-66

LOL! It seems they were just so PISSED at the reporter for reporting, that they had to take their frustrations out via his photo's name. TAKE THAT, reporter -- you're a weasel! We got you! Nanny, nanny boo boo!

Guess we're just lucky that the photog wasn't deemed "Harlotwithazoomlens"!

David Parker federal civil rights appeal heard before 3-judge panel in Boston Federal Court [MassResistance]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Dang! you find the craziest stuff, I wish had your 'out of the box' kind of thinking.
That was a fun to read.

Posted by: ~Dawn | Dec 8, 2007 7:23:50 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails