RECENT  POSTS:  » Video: Man who's directly compared homosexuality to pedophilia will now lecture you on extremism » The 'why can't they take their business elsewhere?' line: Not only offensive but legally meaningless » FRC's ridiculously bunk new poll (*from partisan polling firm) » Video: 'Vice' covers the sad, dangerous, discredited world of 'conversion therapy' » Buzzfeed: Jeb Bush's nascent team is teeming with gay Republicans » FRC prays against gay acceptance to 'avoid the wrath of God' » Video: Mark Cuban supports religious biz owners that 'just say no' to serving same-sex weddings » We're not driven by animus, say groups that are known for showing animus toward gay couples » Video: Onetime LGBT community foe delivers crushing blow to 'religious freedom' (a.k.a. license to discriminate) bills » Q. How does Mark Regnerus 'prove' he's not an anti-gay activist?  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/08/2008

An error, both in judgement and typography

by Jeremy Hooper

 Good As You Images Picture-1-107We just got done reading a long-winded piece that the American Family Association's Ed Vitagliano has written for the most recent edition of AFA Journal, wherein he positions the "ex-gay" movement as "truth," and being gay as some sort of a lie that we queers made up because it makes our lives just SO MUCH easier. We listened in as Mr. Vitagliano used the very suspect (at best) Jones & Yarhouse study to justify his pro-"ex-gay" positions. We noticed how he responded to increase gay acceptance as if it's a bad thing. Also, we were treated to his painting of positive gay portrayals on television as gay propaganda, and not just a natural occurrence brought about by screenwriters and producers who know how normal gay people truly are. And while we hemmed and hawed internally at the bald-faced lies that Mr. Vitagliano was trying to pass off to his anti-gay readers, we were concerned about how we were going to respond to his musings. After all, we've already said SO MUCH about the "ex-gay" movement and gay acceptance in general that we really had nothing new to say about Ed's article. We were worried.

Then, however, we got to the footnotes. In desperate need of something of value to derive from our efforts, we were delighted when we came across this (highlighting our own):

200801081529

Eureka! Problem solved! Our efforts were not in vain. For due to this comical error, we can now respond to the entire piece by simply saying:

"HA, HA! You guys misspelled a word that's used to describe a person who's hired to ensure that such mistakes never make it to print. What next, AFA -- are you gonna tell us about your factts chucker?"

Oh, the Gods of unfortunate typographical mistakes have certainly smiled upon us!! The time we wasted listening to a grow man misuse words like "truth" have been redeemed because of our ability to childishly point a finger and laugh. Redemption -- is there anything sweeter?

If you'd like to read the worthwhile portion for yourself, it can be found at the very bottom of the following link (the 1136th word, to be exact). Trust us -- it's the only portion that's worth the electronic paper it's written on:

Perspectives: Study suggests gays can change -- but truth faces tough opposition [ONN]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts


That made my day! LOL!

Posted by: dave b. | Jan 8, 2008 5:32:39 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails