RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/03/2008

Instead of scoffing, he should've been doing more research

by Jeremy Hooper

 Good As You Images Perkinscolor-1In a short item wherein he makes multiple attempts to decry New Hampshire's recently-enacted civil unions law, the Family Research Council's Tony Perkins (or his ghostwriter) makes the following statement:

"The Associated Press reports a prediction that 3,500 to 4,000 civil unions will be performed this year--which is laughable, given that the 2000 census reported only 2,703 same-sex partner couples in the state."

But unfortunately for him, Tony (or whoever writes the stuff to which he lends his name) is WRONG, WRONG, WRONG. For you see, it is now estimated that the 2000 figure has more than doubled, with there now around 5,578 same-sex couples living in the Granite State (likely due more to couples' willingness to be out of the closet with their relationships than a mass influx of new gays). Here, check out this Williams Institute report (pdf) for the new data.

So while the 3,500-4,000 figure might prove to be an overshot, it's not the laughably inconceivable scenario that Tony would like you to believe. What is laughable, however, is the way folks like Mr. Perkins choose to simply ignore the empirical data that is inconvenient to their cause.

The Great Divorce? [Tony Perkins' Washington Update (3rd item)]

Technorati Tags:

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

So that's where I've been going wrong all this time. It's not the FACT that they "research" that makes them the "research council," it's WHAT they research - namely disinformation.

The Family Disinformation Research Council.

Much better.

Posted by: Emproph | Jan 3, 2008 10:37:38 AM

It's very likely that the majority of gays/lesbians in New Hampshire actually work in Massachusetts.

It's not an uncommon occurance for people with a moderate income in Mass, to live in NH, due the tax and cost of living savings.

Still and all, good news for NH on the civil unions thing. The more equality, the better for everyone!

Posted by: Chris Tucker | Jan 3, 2008 11:18:39 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails