RECENT  POSTS:  » 'No Law Against Woman Marrying Another Woman', says 103 years ago » What the hell is Brian Brown smoking?! » Their bullcaca will never ENDA » Here it is: 'The Manhattan Declaration' » For Gwen For Lateisha For Angie For Adolphus For Simmie For Ebony For Lawrence For Duanna For... » Far right to issue manifesto, drag Big Apple into rotten attacks » 'Daily' video: Wise beyond years vs. unwise inability to get beyond fears » Well since you did ask, Pete... » Poll: NJ will come down to those who can't/won't make up damn mind » Houston, chronically: City's 2nd anti-gay story in as many days  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/30/2008

Only if you want more free time on your honemoon

200801301656You know how religious conservatives like to trot out that infuriating line about how gay people don't need "special rights" since they can already marry someone of the opposite sex? Yea, well most of us who operate on Planet Rational realize that while cohabitating and sharing one's life with an orientation-discordant individual might lead to lots of laughs and fun shopping trips, a hetero-homo union is not going to ultimately lead to a sexually-fulfilled "happily ever after." And as you can see in this advice column, the "Today" show's Dr. Gail Saltz is totally living with us on our reasoned planet:

Should I marry my gay best friend? [MSNBC]

And to those on the far-right who DO want to encourage gay-straight weddings: Thanks, but we actually enjoy our orgasms when they're attached to the situation at hand (among other parts), rather than brought about by images that we have to go to in our mind in order to get through the deed. Call us selfish.

gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-AddThis Feed Button gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

That "gay people can already marry someone of the opposite sex" is so absurd, it shouldn't need a response. However, its advocates are blind to anything but their own animus towards gay folk, and rational and logical consistency isn't their strong suit. Let's apply their logic to them:

"It's perfectly okay to pass a law that makes Christian worship illegal because the law would apply to both Christians and atheists equally."

Equal application of the law is not the same as equal protection of the law. Wish that they could learn this lesson.

Posted by: djsaab | Jan 31, 2008 9:00:05 AM

Talk to us






*Why are my comments not appearing? See the G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails