RECENT  POSTS:  » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs » The religious anti-gay crowd: They never understood the marriage fight; now they don't understand their loss  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/23/2008

Progression? Haven't see it since NOM!

by Jeremy Hooper

The so-called "National Organization For Marriage" group has announced that they're expanding their Jersey-based endeavors into California. They say on their website:

Picture 1-144

We have only three suggestions to offer the group:

(1) Change the word "Californian's" so that the apostrophe is not there. Such a mark is not necessary when one is intending to indicate pluralization as opposed to possession.

(2) Just give it up with this whole "banning gay marriage" thing. Because let's be honest here: The reason why you all are fearing things like this impending CA Supreme Court decision is because you know within your hearts and minds that laws preventing marriage equality are all destined to fall once they are in the hands of a reasoned court. And you have to know that with poll numbers going more in our side's favor every year and the crude tide of early millennial conservatism rapidly ebbing, the days of the American public even entertaining the idea of a gay marriage ban are numbered. More states are legalizing civil unions without incident. Massachusetts has managed to keep their equally non-incidental system of full marriage equality in place despite the tireless attempts to have it overturned. And with every crop of eighteen-year-olds comes an even more gay-accepting electorate. So just face it, kids: When it comes to gays and equality, you're simply on the wrong side of societal progression!

(3) If on our future wedding days you just want to give us cash instead of a gift, that's totally fine. We understand how hard it can be to choose the right item from the registry. So yea -- cash or a check will be fab.

NOM Launches NOM California! [NOM]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Impose same-sex marriage on people; how would that happen? Does that mean that people have imposed opposite-sex marriage on me? hmmm.

Posted by: PodJumper Podcast | Jan 24, 2008 3:36:05 AM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails