RECENT  POSTS:  » What to even say about Josh Duggar? » GOP prez candidates lining up for NOM-sponsored event in Iowa » Video: Ted Cruz tells viciously anti-gay Family Research Council he's got their back on anti-gay discrimination » Scouts prez seeks long overdue end to offensive stigma » FRC prays against Dan Savage 'spewing upon our nation'; I'll let Dan make that joke himself » Sen. (and prez candidate) Cruz to join extreme anti-LGBT activists at Family Research Council event (#WOTW15) » 'Out' magazine's editor-in-chief makes case against gay 'bullies'; it's shortsighted and here's why » Voodoo, snake oil, 'changing' gays: CA congressman to introduce national ban on dangerous anti-science » Because the internet exists, listen to former 'Love Connection' host Chuck Woolery rant about marriage equality » Today in least-you-can-do-ness: Billy Graham's son tweeting anti-equality prayers to SCOTUS justices  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

01/23/2008

Progression? Haven't see it since NOM!

by Jeremy Hooper

The so-called "National Organization For Marriage" group has announced that they're expanding their Jersey-based endeavors into California. They say on their website:

Picture 1-144

We have only three suggestions to offer the group:

(1) Change the word "Californian's" so that the apostrophe is not there. Such a mark is not necessary when one is intending to indicate pluralization as opposed to possession.

(2) Just give it up with this whole "banning gay marriage" thing. Because let's be honest here: The reason why you all are fearing things like this impending CA Supreme Court decision is because you know within your hearts and minds that laws preventing marriage equality are all destined to fall once they are in the hands of a reasoned court. And you have to know that with poll numbers going more in our side's favor every year and the crude tide of early millennial conservatism rapidly ebbing, the days of the American public even entertaining the idea of a gay marriage ban are numbered. More states are legalizing civil unions without incident. Massachusetts has managed to keep their equally non-incidental system of full marriage equality in place despite the tireless attempts to have it overturned. And with every crop of eighteen-year-olds comes an even more gay-accepting electorate. So just face it, kids: When it comes to gays and equality, you're simply on the wrong side of societal progression!

(3) If on our future wedding days you just want to give us cash instead of a gift, that's totally fine. We understand how hard it can be to choose the right item from the registry. So yea -- cash or a check will be fab.

NOM Launches NOM California! [NOM]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Impose same-sex marriage on people; how would that happen? Does that mean that people have imposed opposite-sex marriage on me? hmmm.

Posted by: PodJumper Podcast | Jan 24, 2008 3:36:05 AM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails