RECENT  POSTS:  » Eleven Republican US Sens. give anti-gay conservatives a taste of a near and less divisive future » NOM proudly touts #March4Marriage backers who believe homosexuality 'should be treated by society as immoral, dangerous perversion' » Video: Gee, with compelling videos like this one, I just can't imagine why the anti-gay right is losing in court » #TBT: Even after legal equality, Americans—and particularly religious Americans—struggle to accept certain marriages » Indiana threatens its commerce, tourism dollars, reputation, general welfare of its citizenry » Video: AFA prez expounds on organization's movement-destructive ad by adding even more religious fervor » NOM resorts to blatant lying in its 2015 #March4Marriage materials » NOM coalition partner: America will fall unless you March For Marriage » AFA helps SCOTUS see that opposition to *civil* marriage equality is all about religious fervor » Video: Did this Texas 'biblical marriage' rally assemble least diverse crowd in recorded human history?  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

02/22/2008

Audio: They must've read 'And Tango Makes Threesomes' instead

by Jeremy Hooper

Those Concerned Women For America are once again concerned about something gay-related. This time it's And Tango Makes Three, that much debated children's book about gay penguins raising a family. Listen in:


powered by ODEO

"Sexually explicit"?!?! Are you ladies being serious right now, or is this a parody of socially conservative reactionary thought!? Because those of us who've actually read the book know that the charming children's tale is about as sexual as a nun who was born without genitalia! And these fallacious attempts to make it look graphically sex-based are absolutely enraging!

When children's books feature a prince charming and some sort of damsel in distress who ultimately winds up in the aforementioned royal's arms, social conservatives deem the story nothing more than a simple matter of love. But when it involves gay couples, they consider the exact same concepts to be disgusting sin orgies that will warp the impressionable kids' minds. Never mind that gay families have kids in these same public schools. Never mind that gay children have struggled for years in environments that, from day one, has fed them the message that they are "abnormal." For folks like Janice Crouse and Martha Kleder, children's books geared towards the hetero mindsets are simply called Cinderella, while ones geared towards gay lives and loves are classified as a Sin-that-will-take-ya-to-hella. And it's these attempts to ignore actuality and demonize a population sect in order to appease their religious viewpoints that constitutes true "indoctrination"!

And Tango Makes Three [CWA]

***UPDATE: Daimeon from Pam's House Blend emailed Janice Crouse about her labeling the book "sexually explicit." She told him it was "error" and that she was "thinking about another book:

Damn Kinky Penguins! [PHB]

But regardless of which of the major gay children's books she may have been thinking of (likely King & King), none of them are truly "sexually explicit." So while we accept that she made a mistake, the mentality of viewing hetero-centric books in one way and homo-centric ones in another would seem to be the larger error.

***UPDATE2: CWA has now pulled the audio.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails