RECENT  POSTS:  » I'm pretty sure Maggie Gallagher just called the National Org. For Marriage ineffective » 379 companies that want their logos paired with uplifting music in inevitable marriage (in)equality documentaries » NOM affiliate group to give Roy Moore a 'Letter from Birmingham Jail Award' » Save the Date: SCOTUS to hear history-making marriage cases on April 28 » Wall Street's biggest put stock in equal bonds » Gross: Tony Perkins makes some sort of 'ugly baby' joke at Hillary Clinton's expense » Really, suddenly contrite Ben Carson? Because you were pretty cocksure before! » ADF links A-Rod's drug suspension with florist's anti-gay discrimination; huh?! » NOM: Marriage means putting choking hazards on your baby's toes » Video: Ben Carson is apparently one felony conviction away from fellating a man  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/07/2008

Audio: Coupling of Sarah/Jessica still not for Parker

by Jeremy Hooper

Confused about why teaching Massachusetts children about the state's currently legal practice of opposite-gender marriage is simply the moral and right thing to do, yet letting them know about the state's currently legal practice of same-sex marriage is "insidious indoctrination." Well in a new audio chat with the Concerned Women For America, anti-gay parent (and social conservative martyr) David Parker will try and explain that and more for you:


powered by ODEO

So did he convince you that employing a faith-based, heterosexist double standard is accurate public policy for a fair and free nation of tax-paying people? No? The opposite? He actually made you realize just to what lengths these folks wish to take their biased viewpoints? Well then congratulations, lover of rational thought. You've realized that open minds will be filled with tasteless fluid if they don't distance themselves from brainwashing.

Audio source: Parental Rights Case Goes to the U.S. Supreme Court [CWA]

**Oh, and it can't be stressed enough that Parker's child was simply given the option -- THE OPTION! -- of reading a pro-acceptance children's book! He was not forced to read it!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts


"You've realized that open minds will drown underneath the weight of too much brainwashing."

Something's wrong with the meaning. I'm guessing that it should read "...will not drown..."

Have a good weekend -

:) db

Posted by: dave b. | Mar 7, 2008 5:32:05 PM

No, Dave. It might be a little clumsy, but the meaning is that open minds will fill up if the flood of brainwashing is let in. I'll edit it.

Posted by: G-A-Y | Mar 7, 2008 5:39:23 PM

No one should be shocked at the deceptive practices of CWFA and their illk(purposely misspelled), but if someone just glanced at the title of the article, it would appear that the Supreme Court has already reviewed the details of the case and accepted the request for an appeal.

Posted by: Jeff | Mar 7, 2008 8:42:31 PM

Sorry.

I had thought that open minds would filter out the bs by themselves and identify the truth.....and that was what you meant.

Maybe I place too much faith in open minds.

I hope not.

Posted by: dave b | Mar 7, 2008 9:34:12 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails