RECENT  POSTS:  » 'No Law Against Woman Marrying Another Woman', says 103 years ago » What the hell is Brian Brown smoking?! » Their bullcaca will never ENDA » Here it is: 'The Manhattan Declaration' » For Gwen For Lateisha For Angie For Adolphus For Simmie For Ebony For Lawrence For Duanna For... » Far right to issue manifesto, drag Big Apple into rotten attacks » 'Daily' video: Wise beyond years vs. unwise inability to get beyond fears » Well since you did ask, Pete... » Poll: NJ will come down to those who can't/won't make up damn mind » Houston, chronically: City's 2nd anti-gay story in as many days  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

03/11/2008

Spitzer swallows equality push? Or will Paterson step it up?

200803111130Eliot Spitzer might have been the first governor in the nation to voluntarily introduce marriage equality legislation. But could a Spitzer resignation actually help LGBT rights? The Advocate's fabulous Kerry Eleveld takes a look at that possibility:

Could Spitzer's Woes Have a Silver Lining? [Advocate]

Of course we'll first have to see if the governor even resigns. At this point, however, his remaining in office seems about as unlikely as sex that's great enough to justify a $4,300 price tag.

gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-AddThis Feed Button gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

I feel that CWA is only practicing selective enforcement on materials that they deem unacceptable. I think that if a school added the Bible to its reading list CWA would probably praise the school for lessons into “family values”, “morality”, and how the school was fighting against the so called “homosexual agenda.”
But any parent that wanted to remove the bible from the reading list by pointing out that the bible is loaded with murder, rape, intolerance for those of other religions, capital punishment for trivial offenses (children disrespecting parents), God sanctioned murder, Genocide (Sodom and Gomorra),misogamy and a whole host of there violent and profane acts would immediately be labeled as “anti-families values”, “anti-religion”, an atheist, Satan worshiper, and a homosexual activist.

Posted by: Jeff Chang | Mar 11, 2008 10:20:29 PM

Talk to us






*Why are my comments not appearing? See the G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails