RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/12/2008

Video: Annoyingly, there are some who'd prefer the brothers and sisters to marry each other

by Jeremy Hooper

It might not earn them the same rights and benefits as those 'rosexuals who get tele-married.  But we defy you to find a sweeter, more earnest TV union than the one that aired on last night's "Brothers & Sisters":

Mazel tov, boys.   Now go and have yourself a not-suitable-for-broadcast tele-honeymoon!

Kevin & Scotty's Wedding Ceremony on "Brothers & Sisters" [YouTube]

*Earlier: The proposal [G-A-Y]

*See also: GLAAD has a roundup of TV gay weddings [CineQueer]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails