RECENT  POSTS:  » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something.  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

05/09/2008

Wrong Penn used in AFA's picture

by Jeremy Hooper

We knew that the American Family Association's One News Now site twisted the news, but we did think they at least tried to stay up to date on the developments that they proceed to misrepresent! Though judging by this new report, we might have given the outlet too much credit:

5/9/2008

A constitutional amendment that would protect traditional marriage is one step closer to getting on the ballot in Pennsylvania.

Pro-family activists in Pennsylvania are working feverishly to get a constitutional amendment protecting traditional marriage through both legislative bodies in that state. By a vote of 18 to 8, the Senate Appropriations Committee sent a marriage protection amendment to the full Senate. S.B. 1250 would define marriage as only between a man and a woman in Pennsylvania.

Diane Gramley, president of the American Family Association of Pennsylvania, says the amendment now heads to the full Senate where it is expected to pass. It will then go to the House, where she says it will be a tough fight.
...
Pro-family forces have until the end of June to get the amendment through both legislative bodies. Then the entire process must be repeated next year for the measure to appear on the ballot in November 2009.

Only problem for ONN? The amendment was already shelved by the Senate. Two days ago. And at this point, it's highly unlikely bordering on impossible that the measure could return this legislative session. It's not one step closer to passage -- it's one step closer to being thrown into the dustbin of Keystone state history where it belongs!

Come on, One News Now. You are really starting to make it too easy!

The future of marriage in Penn. [ONN]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

I have already sent them a very nice comment about the amendment. I wonder if they will publish it.

Posted by: a. mcewen | May 9, 2008 2:00:01 PM

Thank you. I have always thought I was a pretty good person. ... Passed.

Posted by: LOrion | May 9, 2008 2:42:16 PM

Now the 'real' link works... but the story is still days old and WRONG, luckily.

Posted by: LOrion | May 9, 2008 2:45:26 PM

They never publish any of my comments either! Probably because I use words that they don't understand???

Posted by: Dick Mills | May 9, 2008 3:47:05 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails