RECENT  POSTS:  » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs » The religious anti-gay crowd: They never understood the marriage fight; now they don't understand their loss  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/08/2008

Study: Despite biased claims, gays really aren't army obliterators

by Jeremy Hooper

 Good As You Images DadtmonkA study released yesterday by the Michael D. Palm Center indicates that camouflaged 'mos are unlikely to undermine unit cohesion, leading to the conclusion that the military's needless, biased "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy should be repealed:

Study: Military gays don't undermine unit cohesion [AP via Yahoo!]

And the beauty part? This study wasn't conducted by Joe Schmos with a vested interest in putting gays in combat boots, but rather by four retired military officers whose vested interest is in the military itself. So here's hoping this research will be just one more step in silencing those whose vested interest is in prolonging a needless, unjust "culture war" with a demonized enemy of their own hyperbolic design.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails