RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/08/2008

Study: Despite biased claims, gays really aren't army obliterators

by Jeremy Hooper

 Good As You Images DadtmonkA study released yesterday by the Michael D. Palm Center indicates that camouflaged 'mos are unlikely to undermine unit cohesion, leading to the conclusion that the military's needless, biased "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy should be repealed:

Study: Military gays don't undermine unit cohesion [AP via Yahoo!]

And the beauty part? This study wasn't conducted by Joe Schmos with a vested interest in putting gays in combat boots, but rather by four retired military officers whose vested interest is in the military itself. So here's hoping this research will be just one more step in silencing those whose vested interest is in prolonging a needless, unjust "culture war" with a demonized enemy of their own hyperbolic design.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails