RECENT  POSTS:  » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win.  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/08/2008

Study: Despite biased claims, gays really aren't army obliterators

by Jeremy Hooper

 Good As You Images DadtmonkA study released yesterday by the Michael D. Palm Center indicates that camouflaged 'mos are unlikely to undermine unit cohesion, leading to the conclusion that the military's needless, biased "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy should be repealed:

Study: Military gays don't undermine unit cohesion [AP via Yahoo!]

And the beauty part? This study wasn't conducted by Joe Schmos with a vested interest in putting gays in combat boots, but rather by four retired military officers whose vested interest is in the military itself. So here's hoping this research will be just one more step in silencing those whose vested interest is in prolonging a needless, unjust "culture war" with a demonized enemy of their own hyperbolic design.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails