Study: Despite biased claims, gays really aren't army obliterators

RECENT	POSTS:	» And now in news for the naive: As long as gay scouts are banned, boys won't discuss sex » Supposedly marriage-focused NOM promotes Boy Scouts discrimination » Married gay celeb challenges misconceptions, elementary-level spelling errors » Anita, meet Uma » WaPo poll: Majority of Virginians are for all lovers » GLAAD: Equal Scouting opponent says BSA only bans activists; is fibbing » Drug-resistant gonorrhea is a 'wage of sin'? NOM senior staffer 'likes' that » What the Boy Scouts' anti-equality coalition is engendering » Video: French waitress comes out, celebrates marriage equality; your grilled cheese will have to wait » The weirdest anti-gay video you will ever see; I'm serious; guaranteed; just watch

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

07/08/2008

by Jeremy Hooper

Good As You Images Dadtmonk A study released yesterday by the Michael D. Palm Center indicates that camouflaged 'mos are unlikely to undermine unit cohesion, leading to the conclusion that the military's needless, biased "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy should be repealed:

Study: Military gays don't undermine unit cohesion [AP via Yahoo!]

And the beauty part? This study wasn't conducted by Joe Schmos with a vested interest in putting gays in combat boots, but rather by four retired military officers whose vested interest is in the military itself. So here's hoping this research will be just one more step in silencing those whose vested interest is in prolonging a needless, unjust "culture war" with a demonized enemy of their own hyperbolic design.

space