RECENT  POSTS:  » Read: NOM's guide to pressuring lawmakers to ban marriages (while pretending you're doing something good and positive instead) » Full trailer: 'The Normal Heart' » Vintage Clinton era oppo memo perhaps even more relevant today » Concerned Women For America advises churches to lockdown exclusionary marriage views » Video: What does conservative columnist Cal Thomas see as America's biggest threat? Take a guess. » Correcting NOM's fallacious fear graphic » Gee, Bryan, can't understand why federal courts are rejecting you gay = incest view » Former NOM sr. associate admits shift: Moving away from intellectual arguments, focusing on spiritual » Prop 8 defense attorney now planning lesbian daughter's wedding » If you can't afford your event, NOM, perhaps you should just cancel  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

08/08/2008

95 years of 'curing' non-illnesses

by Jeremy Hooper

Recently 1913 made gay headlines because of the repeal of the law from that year that had previously been used to deny out-of-state gays and lesbians the right to marry in Massachusetts. Well today our pal Jim Burroway finds another reason to bring that early 20th century year to gay light, as he has discovered a fascinating article from the August 2, 1913 edition of the Journal of the American Medical Association, in which the antiquated subject of "curing" homosexuality is discussed. Head over to Box Turtle Bulletin and check that out:

Curing Homosexuality in 1913 [BTB]

The suggestions are castration, bladder washing, and prostate massages? Oh my. But then again, in 95 more years, we imagine beating a pillow with a tennis racket while screaming "MOM!" will look just as odd.

Ironically, this writer thinks prostate massages are what the closed the deal for me in terms of my own gayness!

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

What no takers!.... and here I am in the airport in LasVegas having to post a comment that no one else would! Knew you couldn't resists that one JH. (or two or three, etc.)

Posted by: LOrion | Aug 9, 2008 2:36:35 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails