RECENT  POSTS:  » Focus on the Family creates itemized price list for 'saving' marriage » Fox News pays this person for his opinions » Pat Buchanan doubles down on 1983 column claiming AIDS is nature's punishment » Is NOM really going to push for a constitutional convention on marriage? » Video: Great piece from 'CBS Sunday Morning' highlights sweet success » Yes, the American marriage equality fight is over—the rest is just bluster » Goodnight from the White House to your house » AL Chief Justice Roy Moore calls marriage equality worse than segregation decision » And by opposition 'from all sides,' FRC means exclusively from the (R) side » Video: What it looked like when that thing happened today  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

09/16/2008

Superfluous word, pointed usage

by Jeremy Hooper

The following headline, with a certain unnecessary detail about the adoptee, is running on the American Family Association's One News Now site:

Picture 3-147

We predict it will be followed up later today with this story:

200809161226

But actually, on second thought, they would never run this followup. Revealing their modus operandi would totally ruin their game.

Judge rules homosexual man can adopt male foster child [ONN]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

I'm sorry, but it must be pointed out: The author's name is Charlie Butts.

Posted by: Brendan D. | Sep 16, 2008 2:22:57 PM

I think they even got the facts wrong in the article. They stated MS is the only other state that forbids gays adopting. My understanding is that MS and UT forbid unmarried couples from adopting but don't actually stop gay singles from adopting, like Florida does. (The new 'sneaky' way of trying to ban us from adopting....)

Posted by: Phil | Sep 16, 2008 4:20:34 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails