RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM to gay families: Your relationships are 'simply about adult sexual desires' » Maggie Gallagher's new gig » How do you even talk with a movement that insists we 'cannot coexist'? » Sen. Manchin picks odd way to (D-istinguish) himself » Photo: Before city council votes on nondiscrimination, Charlotte anti-LGBT activists frame us as 'Homo-Nazis' » AG Holder: 'Marriage equality is an idea whose time has come.' » Viciously anti-gay activist Scott Lively to help us show SCOTUS what animus looks like; thanks, doll! » Audio: NOM prez equates his anti-gay fight with defeating slavery, conquering 'evils that were occurring in the Roman empire' » SCOTUS deals another blow to NOM; more to surely come! » Federal judge strikes Nebraska's discriminatory marriage ban  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/20/2008

Video: Potential federal mistake supports another

by Jeremy Hooper

This from the Christian Broadcast Network:

Still want to defend her as an "inclusive" Republican, Log Cabin?

Sarah Palin on the Brody File - Marriage Amendment [YouTube]
(h/t: Joe My God)

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Hmm, so she is for "traditional marriage"? How can that be? She has JOB!!! Isn't the "traditional" wife supposed to stay home, make babies and have dinner ready for "hubby"? Isn't she being a bit hypicritical, having a MAJORLY powerful job AND not staying home to care for her children?

just my 2 cents.
aj

Posted by: aj | Oct 21, 2008 11:16:40 PM

How can someone running for office only be for some Americans, but not all, not you people over there. That doesn't make any sense.

Posted by: Kevin | Oct 23, 2008 1:40:32 AM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails