RECENT  POSTS:  » Riiiiiiight, FRC. And 'Desperate Housewives' is still TV's hot new show, too » After death do us part: Indignity of Idaho's marriage ban threatens lesbian veteran's final wishes » NOM's Chair to Oregon: We have a right to tell courts our personal, conservative Catholic opinions! » Nice try, anti-equality movement, but the lesbian 'throuple' story makes our argument, not yours » Jonah Goldberg can't see the hornets' nest for its hornets » Video: Male on mail » Jodie Foster in 2013: 'I am'; Jodie Foster in 2014: 'I do' » AFA promotes its new app in only way it knows how » Robert Oscar Lopez says I perform 'psychological operations routine' on him when I quote his own words from his own web site » Matt Barber's ever-classy site suggests gay people are literally crushing fellow humans  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/20/2008

Video: Potential federal mistake supports another

by Jeremy Hooper

This from the Christian Broadcast Network:

Still want to defend her as an "inclusive" Republican, Log Cabin?

Sarah Palin on the Brody File - Marriage Amendment [YouTube]
(h/t: Joe My God)

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Hmm, so she is for "traditional marriage"? How can that be? She has JOB!!! Isn't the "traditional" wife supposed to stay home, make babies and have dinner ready for "hubby"? Isn't she being a bit hypicritical, having a MAJORLY powerful job AND not staying home to care for her children?

just my 2 cents.
aj

Posted by: aj | Oct 21, 2008 11:16:40 PM

How can someone running for office only be for some Americans, but not all, not you people over there. That doesn't make any sense.

Posted by: Kevin | Oct 23, 2008 1:40:32 AM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails