RECENT  POSTS:  » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win. » By the time you read this headline, we'll be ten more seconds beyond stagnant anti-gay 'culture wars' » Video: America cannot wait—to purchase American Family Association radio equipment? Huh?! » Huckabee 2016: 'cause church and state aint gonna marry themselves » EEOC does wonky, under-radar thing that could lay groundwork for definitive nondiscrimination protections » Maggie Gallagher, now that you've lost on marriage, might you lose these deceptive ways as well? » Crowdfunding discriminatory business owners: Perfect statement on anti-gay movement's current affairs  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/20/2008

Video: Potential federal mistake supports another

by Jeremy Hooper

This from the Christian Broadcast Network:

Still want to defend her as an "inclusive" Republican, Log Cabin?

Sarah Palin on the Brody File - Marriage Amendment [YouTube]
(h/t: Joe My God)

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Hmm, so she is for "traditional marriage"? How can that be? She has JOB!!! Isn't the "traditional" wife supposed to stay home, make babies and have dinner ready for "hubby"? Isn't she being a bit hypicritical, having a MAJORLY powerful job AND not staying home to care for her children?

just my 2 cents.
aj

Posted by: aj | Oct 21, 2008 11:16:40 PM

How can someone running for office only be for some Americans, but not all, not you people over there. That doesn't make any sense.

Posted by: Kevin | Oct 23, 2008 1:40:32 AM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails