RECENT  POSTS:  » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall' » And now NOM is literally pleading with its (theoretical) supporters » Add 'professional advocate for anti-gay scouting' to list of bygone career choices » NOM to lasso the White House with a rosary. Or something. » NOM's new plan? To beat up its org-crushing loss until it becomes a win.  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/01/2008

Video: Untruth in advertising

by Jeremy Hooper

On Monday, after posting the first TV ad from California's anti-gay side, we proceeded to point out how the reasoning behind one particular point of the (super boring!) ad is completely flawed. Now an enterprising YouTuber has pointed out even more bits o' B.S.:

But in our opposition's defense: Their entire campaign is based on chicanery. So in terms of the product matching the pitch, nobody can really cite them for false advertising.

Yes on Prop 8 Ad - Protect Marriage California [YouTube]
*Our complete Prop 8 archive: Prop 8. [G-A-Y]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Also, why in the heck is a professor of a university that is affiliated with Churches of Christ telling so many lies.

Five lies in 30 seconds. Shame on Pepperdine University for such lies.

Pepperdine should debate the truth and stop lying. Or can't they?

Posted by: Lee | Oct 1, 2008 7:09:32 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails