RECENT  POSTS:  » NOM spends six figures on North Carolina's Hagan/Tillis US Senate race » Idaho wedding venue can be discriminatory so long as it sticks to new business model » Sunday in Houston: Activists mad that churches were noted for their politicization head to a church—to politicize » Lisa Kudrow thinks my website title is modest, at best » Do you take this man to be your lawfully wedded mission of destruction? » MassResistance's hilarious fourteen-point plan for reinstating marriage discrimination: Get really, really nasty » Concerned Women For America finally learns to call out anti-gay rhetoric » 'Rivka Edelman' responds to me via one of the most bizarre comments I've ever read » Just going to another vendor isn't always easy, isn't good basis for sound policy » Pat Robertson: People who believe in fair nondiscrimination law are 'terrorists, radicals, and extremists'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/01/2008

Video: Untruth in advertising

by Jeremy Hooper

On Monday, after posting the first TV ad from California's anti-gay side, we proceeded to point out how the reasoning behind one particular point of the (super boring!) ad is completely flawed. Now an enterprising YouTuber has pointed out even more bits o' B.S.:

But in our opposition's defense: Their entire campaign is based on chicanery. So in terms of the product matching the pitch, nobody can really cite them for false advertising.

Yes on Prop 8 Ad - Protect Marriage California [YouTube]
*Our complete Prop 8 archive: Prop 8. [G-A-Y]

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

Also, why in the heck is a professor of a university that is affiliated with Churches of Christ telling so many lies.

Five lies in 30 seconds. Shame on Pepperdine University for such lies.

Pepperdine should debate the truth and stop lying. Or can't they?

Posted by: Lee | Oct 1, 2008 7:09:32 PM

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails