RECENT  POSTS:  » Where art thou, Jeremy? » Video: Ad for blemish remover/ tourist spot for our new, bettered America » Whether justified or Kim Davis-ed, individualistic rage rarely outplays broader truths » Kim Davis: The almost too perfect coda to the marriage discrimination fight » Anti-gay clerks are going to have to do their jobs. Because of course they are. » Jeb really wants to remind voters of his anti-'same status' plan for gay couples » Maine: NOM finally forced to hand over its tiny, out-of-state, incestuous donor roll » This delusional primary: Huckabee claims 'same-sex marriage is not the law of the land' » The 'Yeah. Duh. Of course' phase of this fight » Trailer: 'Stonewall'  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »


You may write the 'bride'

by Jeremy Hooper

When marriage equality came to California, officials quickly changed the licensing forms so that they would be gender-neutral. But now, in a perfectly fair and reasoned move that should (but won't) quell the cries of social conservatives, the state has changed the forms once again so that participants (of any gender) can choose to be "bride" and "groom" if their attachment to those particular words makes them feel more civilly married:

Bride' and 'groom' being restored to California marriage forms [Mercury News]

Personally, if California will just rid itself of Prop 8, we'll agree to brand ourselves "chicken butt" and "enema stew" on the marriage forms. Because it ain't the words we're after -- it's the equality!

But this is a good move that nips the "gays are changing marriage" arguments even more fully in the bud. So yay -- we'll totally take this new license to be our lawfully-wedded ticket to rights.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper

Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy

Related Posts with Thumbnails