RECENT  POSTS:  » Jodie Foster in 2013: 'I am'; Jodie Foster in 2014: 'I do' » AFA promotes its new app in only way it knows how » Robert Oscar Lopez says I perform 'psychological operations routine' on him when I quote his own words from his own web site » Matt Barber's ever-classy site suggests gay people are literally crushing fellow humans » Bryan Fischer is on to our comic book villain–in-chief » Southern Baptist Theological Seminary's Al Mohler 'can't give' us acceptance; good thing we're not asking » NOM fails to trip up Oregon marriage case » Audio: Tony Perkins equates opposing equality with opposing Nazis » 'WaPo' conservative columnist: 'Strident' marriage equality opponents have lost » If you feel like you hear about another marriage case every day, here's why  

« Go back a post || Return to G-A-Y homepage || Haul tail to next post »

10/07/2008

You may write the 'bride'

by Jeremy Hooper

When marriage equality came to California, officials quickly changed the licensing forms so that they would be gender-neutral. But now, in a perfectly fair and reasoned move that should (but won't) quell the cries of social conservatives, the state has changed the forms once again so that participants (of any gender) can choose to be "bride" and "groom" if their attachment to those particular words makes them feel more civilly married:

Bride' and 'groom' being restored to California marriage forms [Mercury News]

Personally, if California will just rid itself of Prop 8, we'll agree to brand ourselves "chicken butt" and "enema stew" on the marriage forms. Because it ain't the words we're after -- it's the equality!

But this is a good move that nips the "gays are changing marriage" arguments even more fully in the bud. So yay -- we'll totally take this new license to be our lawfully-wedded ticket to rights.

space gay-comment gay-G-A-Y-post gay-email gay-writer-jeremy-hooper


Your thoughts

comments powered by Disqus

G-A-Y Comments Policy


 
Related Posts with Thumbnails